Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 May 2009
Published in Crop Sci 49:1023-1028 (2009)
© 2009 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viator, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Richard, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Viator, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Richard, E. P., Jr.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Viator, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Richard, E. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Residue management
Right arrow Sugarcane

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

Sugarcane Postharvest Residue Management in a Temperate Climate

Ryan P. Viatora,*, Richard M. Johnsona, Deborah L. Boykinb and Edward P. Richard, Jr.a

a USDA-ARS Sugarcane Research Lab., 5883 USDA Rd., Houma, LA 70360
b USDA-ARS Mid South Area Office, 141 Experiment Station Rd., Stoneville, MS 38776

* Corresponding author (ryan.viator{at}ars.usda.gov).

Full retention of sugarcane (interspecific hybrids of Saccharum spp.) postharvest residue may reduce ratoon crop yields. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different residue removal timings and methods on sugarcane yield. A two-factor (timing and method) experiment was conducted on both clay and silt loam soils in southeastern Louisiana. Removal timings consisted of the following physiological stages: predormancy, complete dormancy, intermediate dormancy, and postdormancy. Removal methods consisted of partial removal from the row top by mechanical means, complete removal by burning, and no removal (control) applied to first, second, and third ratoons. Sugar yields following burning at predormancy (6800 kg ha–1), complete dormancy (6610 kg ha–1), and mechanical removal at predormancy (6500 kg ha–1) were greater than the control (6190 kg ha–1) for all ratoons. Burning at postdormancy decreased sugar yields by 440 kg ha–1 relative to the control. Ratoons responded similarly to the residue management practices evaluated, and effects were consistent on both clay and silt loam soils. Results show that the residue generated during the green-cane harvesting of sugarcane in Louisiana should be removed from harvested fields as soon after harvest as possible to ensure optimum yields of subsequent ratoon crops.

Abbreviations: TRS, theoretical recoverable sucrose







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Crop Science Society of America.