Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 17 March 2009
Published in Crop Sci 49:498-508 (2009)
© 2009 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moon, H.S.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, R.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moon, H.S.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, R.S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Moon, H.S.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, R.S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tobacco
Right arrow Plant Genetic Resources
Right arrow Crop Genetics

CROP BREEDING & GENETICS

Changes in Genetic Diversity of U.S. Flue-Cured Tobacco Germplasm over Seven Decades of Cultivar Development

H.S. Moona, J.S. Nicholsonb, A. Heinemanc, K. Lionc, R. van der Hoevend, A.J. Hayesd and R.S. Lewisa,*

a Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695
b USDA-APHIS Plant Protection and Quarantine, Raleigh, NC 27606
c Lancaster Laboratories, Richmond, VA, 23234
d Philip Morris USA, Richmond, VA 23261

* Corresponding author (ramsey_lewis{at}ncsu.edu).

Plant breeding methodologies have been applied to flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) for approximately seven decades. As has been observed in several other crops, stringent quality requirements have resulted in use of conservative breeding strategies in the development of new cultivars. The impact of breeding practices on genetic diversity within U.S. flue-cured tobacco germplasm has not been investigated. In this study, we genotyped 117 tobacco cultivars from eight sequential time periods with 71 microsatellite primer pairs. A total of 294 alleles were scored. Only a fraction (48%) of alleles present in the initial germplasm pool was represented in cultivars released during the 1990s and 2000s. Only 13 and 18 alleles were detected in the 1990s and 2000s, respectively, which were undetected in the initial gene pool. The overall trend was one of gradual reduction in allelic counts at microsatellite loci, indicating a reduction in diversity over time at the gene level. Average genetic similarity was highest among cultivars of the 1990s and 2000s, reflecting a reduction in genetic diversity at the population level. This observed narrowing of the U.S. flue-cured tobacco germplasm base in combination with low rates of genetic gain for yield in the last 20 years may point to a need for diversification of parental materials used in future breeding crosses. Reported genetic relationships among the group of genotyped cultivars may be valuable for future strategic germplasm choices.

Abbreviations: AFLP, amplified fragment length polymorphism • RAPD, random amplified polymorphic DNA • PCO, principle co-ordinate analysis • PIC, polymorphic information content • SSR, simple sequence repeat • UPGMA, Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Averaging




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
H. S. Moon, J. M. Nifong, J. S. Nicholson, A. Heineman, K. Lion, R. van der Hoeven, A. J. Hayes, and R. S. Lewis
Microsatellite-based Analysis of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Genetic Resources
Crop Sci., October 22, 2009; 49(6): 2149 - 2159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Crop Science Society of America.