Crop Science Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 17 March 2009
Published in Crop Sci 49:395-402 (2009)
© 2009 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Xie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, X.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Xie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, X.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Plant Analysis

GENOMICS, MOLECULAR GENETICS & BIOTECHNOLOGY

Protein Extraction Methods Compatible with Proteomic Analysis for the Cotton Seedling

Chengjian Xie, De Wang and Xingyong Yang*

Key Laboratory of Eco-Environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Ministry of Education) and Biotechnology Research Center, Southwest Univ., Chongqing 400716, China

* Corresponding author (yangxy94{at}swu.edu.cn).

An efficient protein extraction method to ensure successful separation by two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) is a critical step for any proteomics study. The objective of this study was to compare four previously published protein extraction protocols to identify a suitable protein extraction method to extract total proteins from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings, a recalcitrant plant tissue. The results suggested that trichloroacetic acid/acetone precipitation combined with phenol extraction method (Method D) produced the purest sample and the most proteins spots (321), particularly basic proteins in the 2-DE image. The extraction method combining acetone precipitation and phenol (Method B) gave 216 spots in the 2-DE image. The trichloroacetic acid/acetone precipitation method (Method A) is not suitable for the cotton seedlings because only small molecular weight proteins were visualized in the 2-DE image. The phenol extraction method (Method C) showed 240 spots in the 2-DE gel but gave higher gel background. We subsequently selected and optimized Method D to extract protein from cotton seedlings. After optimization, more than 900 spots were detected on the 2-DE gel with pH 3–10 nonlinear gradient strip and 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) gel using Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 staining. Our results suggest that the optimized Method D is expected to have excellent applications in proteomic studies of cotton seedlings.

Abbreviations: 2-DE, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis • 2-ME, β-mercaptoethanol • CHAPS, 3-[(3-Cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio] propanesulfonic acid • DTT, dithiothreitol • EDTA, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid • IEF, isoelectric focusing • IPG, immobilized pH gradient • Mr, molecular mass • PEG, polyethylene glycol • pI, isoelectric point • PMSF, phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride • PVPP, polyvinylpolypyrrolidone • SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate • SDS–PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis • rubisco, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase • TCA, trichloroacetic acid







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Crop Science Society of America.