Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 17 March 2009
Published in Crop Sci 49:363-380 (2009)
© 2009 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sneller, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Crepieux, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sneller, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Crepieux, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sneller, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Crepieux, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Marker-assisted selection
Right arrow Crop Genetics
Right arrow Statistics

REVIEW & INTERPRETATION

Analytical Approaches and Population Types for Finding and Utilizing QTL in Complex Plant Populations

C. H. Snellera,*, D. E. Matherb and S. Crepieuxc

a Dep. of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State Univ. and the Ohio Agriculture Research and Development Center, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster, Ohio 44691
b Molecular Plant Breeding Cooperative Research Centre and School of Agriculture Food and Wine, The Univ. of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
c Plant Design Consulting, Rue Solleveld 19, 1200 Bruxelles

* Corresponding author (sneller.5{at}osu.edu).

In the past decade plant geneticists began using complex plant populations to identify QTL by association analysis, and the practice is becoming commonplace. Plant populations present unique challenges for association analyses. Plant populations vary in complexity and structure and analyses generally derived from human genetics have been applied to them in a broad fashion. We review analytical techniques and their application in different plant populations. Analyses were classified as either family-based (FBAA) or population-based (PBAA). Over time, the different analyses have been generalized to accommodate a variety of populations, and are complementary. The PBAA are suited for populations with individuals that share little ancestry. Use of PBAA in these types of populations has dominated plant association analyses with success, though PBAA is unlikely to detect some important QTL in highly structured populations. Both PBAA and FBAA are suited for populations of related individuals. The use of FBAA in a breeding population warrants special attention due to features such as large population size, availability of phenotypic data, immediate relevance to marker-assisted selection, ease of QTL validation, and the computational simplicity of tests that require linkage for significance. Specific recommendations for PBAA and FBAA are made as well as some suggestions for future directions of research.

Abbreviations: FBAA, family-based association mapping • FBAT, family-based association testing • HHR, haplotype relative risk • IBD, identical by descent • MAS, marker-assisted selection • PBAA, population-based association mapping • PCA, principal component analysis • QIPDT, quantitative inbred pedigree disequilibrium test • QTL, quantitative trait loci • TDT, transmission/disequilibrium test • tHE, Two-level Hasemen Elston regression







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Crop Science Society of America.