HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hammer, G. L. Articles by Cooper, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hammer, G. L. Articles by Cooper, M. Agricola Articles by Hammer, G. L. Articles by Cooper, M. Related Collections Maize Crop Ecology Crop Genetics

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Can Changes in Canopy and/or Root System Architecture Explain Historical Maize Yield Trends in the U.S. Corn Belt?

^a The University of Queensland, School of Land, Crop, and Food Sciences, Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit (APSRU), Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
^b Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Johnston, IA 50131-0552
^c Dep. of Primary Industries and Fisheries, APSRU, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
^d current address: Syngenta, Slater, IA 50244

^* Corresponding author (g.hammer{at}uq.edu.au).

Continuous increase in the yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the U.S. Corn Belt has involved an interaction with plant density. A number of contributing traits and mechanisms have been suggested. In this study we used a modeling approach to examine whether changes in canopy and/or root system architecture might explain the observed trends. A maize crop model was generalized so that changes in canopy and root system architecture could be examined. A layered, diurnal canopy photosynthesis model was introduced to predict consequences of change in canopy architecture. A two-dimensional root exploration model was introduced to predict consequences of change in root system architecture. Field experiments were conducted to derive model parameters for the base hybrid (Pioneer 3394). Simulation studies for various canopy and root system architectures were undertaken for a range of sites, soils, and densities. Simulated responses to density compared well with those found in field experiments. The analysis indicated that (i) change in root system architecture and water capture had a direct effect on biomass accumulation and historical yield trends; and (ii) change in canopy architecture had little direct effect but likely had important indirect effects via leaf area retention and partitioning of carbohydrate to the ear. The study provided plausible explanations and identified testable hypotheses for future research and crop improvement effort.

Abbreviations: ASI, anthesis–silking interval • EFV, extraction front velocity • LAI, leaf area index