Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 28 January 2009
Published in Crop Sci 49:290-298 (2009)
© 2009 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brye, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by King, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brye, K. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by King, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brye, K. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Stress
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Crop Ecology

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Differential Wilting among Soybean Genotypes in Response to Water Deficit

C. Andy Kinga, Larry C. Purcella,* and Kristofor R. Bryeb

a Univ. of Arkansas, Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 W. Altheimer Dr., Fayetteville, AR 72704
b Univ. of Arkansas, Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 115 Plant Science Building, Fayetteville, AR 72701

* Corresponding author (lpurcell{at}uark.edu).

Genotypic differences for canopy wilting have been reported for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], but no wilting data have been published, and mechanisms for differences remain unresolved. In field studies in 2002 and 2003, differences for wilting among 19 genotypes were consistent across years. Plant introductions (PI 416937 and PI 471938) were among the slowest wilting genotypes, and breeding lines (93705-34 and 93705-95) were among the fastest wilting. Row spacing (18 vs. 80 cm wide) did not affect wilting, indicating that lateral rooting did not contribute to genotypic differences. In a separate field study, volumetric soil water content at 15- and 50-cm depths was generally greater for slow-wilting PI 416937 than for fast-wilting 93705-95. Wilting for both genotypes responded similarly to soil water content (r2 = 0.63–0.74). In a growth chamber study, transpiration declined similarly for fast- and slow-wilting genotypes in response to soil water deficit. Wilting response to soil water was the same for slow-wilting PI 416937 and fast-wilting genotypes 93705-34 and A5959. Slow-wilting 93705-36 began wilting at a lower soil water content than did PI416937, 93705-34, and A5959, indicating that more than one mechanism may be responsible for slow wilting.

Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting • FTSW, fraction of transpirable soil water • NTR, normalized transpiration ratio • PI, plant introduction • VPD, vapor pressure deficit




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
Y. Tanaka and T. Shiraiwa
Stem growth habit affects leaf morphology and gas exchange traits in soybean
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2009; 104(7): 1293 - 1299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Crop Science Society of America.