HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Palaudelmàs, M. Articles by Messeguer, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Palaudelmàs, M. Articles by Messeguer, J. Agricola Articles by Palaudelmàs, M. Articles by Messeguer, J. Related Collections Maize Ecological Risk Assessment Crop Ecology

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

Sowing and Flowering Delays Can Be an Efficient Strategy to Improve Coexistence of Genetically Modified and Conventional Maize

^a Plant Genetics Dep., IRTA, Agrigenomics Research Center (CSIC-IRTA-UAB), Carretera de Cabrils Km 2, 08348 Barcelona, Spain
^b Institut de Tecnologia Agroalimentària (INTEA), Girona Univ., Campus Montilivi EPS-I, 17071 Girona, Spain
^c Plant Molecular Dep., Agrigenomics Research Center (CSIC-IRTA-UAB), Jordi Girona 18, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
^d IRTA Mas Badia, La Tallada de l'Empordà, Girona, Spain

^* Corresponding author (joaquima.messeguer{at}irta.cat).

The coexistence between genetically modified (GM) and non-GM maize (Zea mays L.) fields is subjected to regulation in several countries. A strategy to reduce cross-pollination from GM to non-GM fields was evaluated, on the basis of reducing the flowering coincidence by sowing at separate times. The trial included narrow plots in which transgenic maize was sown before, simultaneously, and after adjacent non-GM maize. A three-week delay between GM and non-GM sowing dates resulted in flowering delays below 5 d for early sowings, but up to 10 to 15 d for late sowings. Cross-pollination was monitored by xenia effect and validated by real-time PCR. The combined effect of flowering delay and distance from the pollen source was evaluated. Cross-pollination dramatically decreased with distance between pollen source and receptor. Flowering delay interacted with distance to the pollen donor source and further reduced GM pollen flow in all cases. Thus, it acted as a regulatory factor. A flowering delay of 92.9 growing degree units (GDU) (7 d in our experimental conditions) was enough to reduce the adventitious presence of GM kernels in non-GM maize plots down to residual values. This study illustrates the possibility of improving coexistence through temporal separation of flowering dates on the basis of appropriate delays in sowing dates.

Abbreviations: GDU, growing degree units • GI, global index • GM, genetically modified • QPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction • W, non-GM white kernel maize • Y, GM yellow kernel maize

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. L. Marshall, J. J. Avritt, S. Maliakal-Witt, J. S. Medeiros, and M. G. M. Shaner The impact of plant and flower age on mating patterns Ann. Bot., October 29, 2009; (2009) mcp260v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Compiled by, F. Tooke, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey Flowering Newsletter bibliography for 2008 J. Exp. Bot., June 23, 2009; (2009) erp154v1. [Full Text] [PDF]