Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 September 2008
Published in Crop Sci 48:1995-2002 (2008)
© 2008 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Board, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Maricherla, D.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Board, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Maricherla, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Board, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Maricherla, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

Explanations for Decreased Harvest Index with Increased Yield in Soybean

James E. Boarda,* and Dinesh Maricherlaa,b

a School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Rm. 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Ctr., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
b current address: BEA Systems, Inc., 4 Van de Graaff Drive, 1st Floor, Burlington, MA 01803

* Corresponding author (jboard{at}agctr.lsu.edu).

Yield in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is controlled by total dry matter (TDM) accumulation and partition of that TDM into yield as measured by harvest index (HI). Previous research indicated that yield responded to TDM at R5 (seed initiation) [TDM(R5)] in an asymptotic relationship that plateaued at about 600 g m–2. As yield rose with TDM(R5), HI declined, thus acting as a yield limiting factor. Explanation for the inverse relationship between yield and HI would help develop research strategies for yield improvement. Our objective was to determine if this negative relationship resulted from an inverse relationship between node production efficiency [node no. per gram TDM(R5)] with TDM(R5). Data for this study were collected from previous studies containing a variety of cultural treatments (planting dates, row spacings, plant populations, and waterlogging) conducted near Baton Rouge, LA (30° N lat), between 1987 and 1996 and combined into a single data set. Regression analyses between yield, TDM(R5), yield components, and production efficiencies of yield components [yield component level per gram TDM(R5)] were conducted. Results indicated that the inverse relationship between HI and yield (R2 = 0.54; b1 = P < 0.0001, b2 = P < 0.05) resulted mainly from a negative relationship between node production efficiency and TDM(R5) (R2 = 0.81; b1 = P < 0.0001, b2 = P < 0.05), which resulted in less efficient production of pods and seeds (the main yield components controlling yield) as TDM(R5) increased. In conclusion, reduced node production efficiency with increased TDM(R5) created the inverse relationship between HI and yield.

Abbreviations: HI, harvest index • TDM, total dry matter







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Crop Science Society of America.