Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 20 May 2008
Published in Crop Sci 48:1164-1169 (2008)
© 2008 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cherney, D. J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cherney, D. J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cherney, D. J. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Crop Ecology

Western Corn Rootworm Damage Subtly Affects Corn Growth under Moderate Environmental Stress

W. J. Coxa,*, E. Shieldsb and D. J. R. Cherneyc

a Dep. of Crop & Soil Sci, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853
b Dep. of Entomology, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853
c Dep. of Animal Science; Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853

* Corresponding author (wjc3{at}cornell.edu).

Western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte) is more prevalent because of its increased adaptation to crop rotation and increased continuous corn (Zea mays L.). A 2-yr field study using seed and soil-applied insecticide treatments evaluated growth responses of corn to rootworm damage. The control had moderately severe (1.40 on a 0–3 node-injury scale), whereas the 1.25 mg kernel–1 clothianidin [(E)1-(2-chloro-1, 3-thiazol-5-ymethyl)-3-methyl-2 nitroguanidine] treatment had minor (0.18) rootworm damage at silking (R1 stage). The control vs. clothianidin had a lower leaf area index at the 12th leaf (V12) stage (2.80 vs. 3.18) but similar values at R1 (4.59 vs. 4.76) and early grain-fill (R3) stages (4.30 vs. 4.64 m2 m–2, respectively). The control vs. clothianidin had a lower mean crop growth rate from R1 to R3 (23.6 vs. 36.3) but similar rates from the V12 to R1 (34.9 vs. 36.4) and R3 to late grain-fill (27.2 vs. 25.3 g m–2 d–1, respectively) stages. The control vs. clothianidin had less kernels per square meter (4423 vs. 4751) but similar kernel weight (257 vs. 248 mg) and harvest index values (0.48 vs. 0.49 kg kg–1, respectively). The control vs. clothianidin had lower yield (9.7 vs. 10.6 Mg ha–1, respectively), but root damage ratings did not correlate with yield (r = –0.19, n = 48). The relationship between corn rootworm damage and corn growth was subtle and inconsistent across growth stages, but the control consistently yielded 8 to 9% less than the clothianidin treatment.

Abbreviations: CGR, crop growth rate • DM, dry matter • GDD, growing degree days • HI, harvest index • LAI, leaf area index • SDD, stress degree days


All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.

Received for publication December 17, 2007.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
W. J. Cox, J. Hanchar, and E. Shields
Stacked Corn Hybrids Show Inconsistent Yield and Economic Responses in New York
Agron. J., November 1, 2009; 101(6): 1530 - 1537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Crop Science Society of America.