|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology Dep., Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717
* Corresponding author (usslt{at}montana.edu).
Hexaploid spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ssp. aestivum) and tetraploid durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) are both widely grown in the Great Plains of North America. Transfer of genes between classes may be beneficial to improvement efforts. However, ploidy level differences lead to variable degrees of sterility in crosses between the two classes. Our aim was to quantify variation among a set of spring wheat genotypes for production of viable euploid progeny after crosses with durum wheat. Hexaploid spring wheat parents varied for their ability to produce viable F5 progeny, with attrition occurring at all stages of the inbreeding process. Polymerase chain reaction primers specific for the seven D chromosomes indicated that most lines derived from spring wheat by durum wheat crosses were euploid, with a preponderance of tetraploid progeny lines for most parents. Our results showed variability among hexaploid genotypes for their ability to produce viable progeny and suggested that Choteau hard red spring wheat may be a good bridge variety for interploidy crosses.
Abbreviations: PCR, polymerase chain reaction SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.
Received for publication June 16, 2007.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |