Crop Science Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 18 December 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:S-190-S-201 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bordes, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bordes, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gallais, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bordes, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Crop Genetics

The Use of Doubled Haploids in Recurrent Selection and Hybrid Development in Maize

A. Gallaisa,* and J. Bordesb

a INRA-UPS-CNRS-INAPG, Station de Génétique Végétale, Ferme du Moulon, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France
b UMR Amélioration des Plantes, INRA-UBP, 234 Avenue du Brezet, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France

* Corresponding author (gallais{at}moulon.inra.fr).

Progress made around the in situ gynogenesis technique allows production in a great number of maize (Zea mays L.) doubled-haploid (DH) lines. Doubled haploids are now largely used in maize breeding. To optimize their use in breeding schemes, it is first required to know whether genetic variation expressed at the level of DH lines is the same as at the level of lines from self-fertilization. In several experiments, with evaluation for testcross performance, good agreement appears between variance expressed in selfed progenies and DH variance for grain yield. Recurrent selection (RS) for testcross performance using doubled haploids (DH-RS) can then be compared to the use of Sn (SnT) plants (S0, S1, S2, ...). From a theoretical approach by numerical application, it was shown that, with the same selection intensity and without off-season nurseries, DH-RS in four years gives the highest genetic advance per year. With the use of off-season nurseries, the same investment in trials and the same rate of reduction of effective population size, to have the advantage of DH-RS the cycle length must be reduced to three years and for traits of low heritability. In an experiment comparing two cycles of RS-S0T selection in four years to one cycle of DH-RS (in three or four years), considering the expected gain per year with a DH-RS cycle in four years, there was an advantage to RS-S0T, whereas with a three-year cycle for the DH method both methods were expected to be equivalent. The observed genetic gains were similar for one DH-RS cycle and the two RS-S0T cycles in four years. In conclusion, there is not a greater advantage from using doubled haploids in RS. However, DH-RS has the advantage of simultaneously producing lines that are directly usable as parents of a hybrid. From a theoretical approach, it is shown that DH-RS is expected to be the best method at the level of genetic advance in variety development, even for medium heritabilities. Furthermore, the whole process appears to be less costly than conventional methods. Use of doubled haploids can thus be very efficient in maize breeding.

Abbreviations: DH, doubled-haploid • RS, recurrent selection • S0T, S1T, S2T, recurrent selection for testcross performance with S0, S1, and S2 plants, respectively • SSD, single-seed descent • VD, variety development

Received for publication April 4, 2007.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.