Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 November 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:2453-2461 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mengistu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Paris, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mengistu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Paris, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mengistu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Paris, R. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Plant Disease

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

Charcoal Rot Disease Assessment of Soybean Genotypes Using a Colony-Forming Unit Index

Alemu Mengistua,*, Jeffery D. Rayb, James R. Smithb and Robert L. Parisc

a USDA-ARS, Crop Genetics and Production Research Unit, Jackson, TN 38301
b USDA-ARS, Crop Genetics and Production Research Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776
c American Chestnut Foundation, Meadowview, VA 24361. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture

* Corresponding author (amengistu{at}ars.usda.gov).

Charcoal rot [Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid] of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is a disease of economic significance throughout the world. Progress in developing resistant genotypes has been hampered because of a lack of reliable and efficient methods for assessment of soybean genotypes. Researchers need a common system for classifying soybean genotypes for their reaction to M. phaseolina that is consistent across environments. We propose a classification system based on a colony-forming unit index (CFUI), derived by dividing the colony-forming unit (CFU) value of a given genotype by the CFU value of a susceptible standard. Four other assessment methods were compared and correlated to CFUI: percent height of stem discoloration measured at R7, foliar symptoms taken at R7, area under the disease progress curve based on foliar symptom data collected four times during the growing season up to R7, and the intensity of internal root and stem discoloration taken at R7 (root and stem severity [RSS]). Twenty-four soybean genotypes in Maturity Groups III through V were evaluated in 2002 and 2003 in naturally and artificially infested fields. Based on the CFUI, four genotypes were classified as moderately resistant to M. phaseolina. Among the disease assessment methods, RSS had the highest correlation with CFUI (r = 0.71 in 2002 and r = 0.69 in 2003). The CFUI provided a good measure of disease resistance across environments but was still time consuming. The RSS provided a less-accurate but more-rapid alternative that may be suitable for some breeding strategies.

Abbreviations: AUDPC, area under the disease progress curve • CFU, colony-forming unit • CFUI, colony-forming unit index • FS, foliar symptom rated at R7 • PDA, potato dextrose agar • PHSD, percent height of stem discoloration • RSS, root and stem severity • SCN, soybean cyst nematode







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.