Crop Science Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:2089-2097 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeVries, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DeVries, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by DeVries, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Seed Quality
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Seed Physiology

SEED PHYSIOLOGY, PRODUCTION & TECHNOLOGY

Determining Seed Performance of Frost-Damaged Maize Seed Lots

Mindy DeVriesa, A. Susana Goggia,* and Kenneth J. Mooreb

a Iowa State Univ., 166 Seed Science Center, Ames, IA 50011
b Iowa State Univ., Agronomy Hall, Ames, IA 50011. This journal paper of the Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Project no. 3638, was supported by the Hatch Act, State of Iowa Funds

* Corresponding author (susana{at}iastate.edu).

Seed quality of maize (Zea mays L.) can be negatively impacted by a fall frost event. It is important for the seed industry to detect frost damage early and to make marketing decisions before the seed lots are conditioned for sale. This study compared several seed quality tests (standard germination [WG], accelerated aging [AA], saturated cold [SC], and soak tests) for their ability to quantify frost damage. Additionally, these tests were used to predict field emergence under poor and average to good field conditions. Two genotypes (B73 x IRF311 and Mo17 x IRF311) were harvested at three moisture contents (300–350, 400–450, and 500–550 g H2O kg–1 fresh weight). An artificial frost treatment was applied to the seed and damage was determined by testing seed after approximately 0, 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 mo of storage. The artificial frost treatment significantly decreased viability and vigor of all the seed lots except Mo17 x IRF311 harvested at 300 to 350 g H2O kg–1 fresh weight. As seeds matured, the damage associated with frost treatment decreased. Laboratory tests did not accurately predict field emergence of frost-damaged seed under poor field conditions; however, AA at 0 mo, SC at approximately 0, 1.5, and 3 mo, and soak at approximately 0, 1.5, and 3 mo had strong relationships to field emergence under average to good field conditions. These results indicate that frost damage in seed lots is quantifiable using the SC and soak tests during approximately the first 3 mo of storage and both tests accurately predict field emergence.

Abbreviations: AA, accelerated aging • SC, saturated cold • WG, standard germination




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. S. Goggi, P. Caragea, L. Pollak, G. McAndrews, M. DeVries, and K. Montgomery
Seed Quality Assurance in Maize Breeding Programs: Tests to Explain Variations in Maize Inbreds and Populations
Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 337 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.