Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:1878-1886 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yonezawa, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yonezawa, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yonezawa, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Genetics
Right arrow Biometrics

CROP BREEDING & GENETICS

Optimization of the Marker-Based Procedures for Pyramiding Genes from Multiple Donor Lines: II. Strategies for Selecting the Objective Homozygous Plant

T. Ishiia and K. Yonezawab,*

a Marker-Assisted Rice Breeding Research Team, National Institute of Crop Science, Tsukuba 305-8518, Japan
b Dep. of Biotechnology, Kyoto Sangyo Univ., Kyoto 603-8555, Japan

* Corresponding author (yonezaw{at}cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp).

For extended application of marker-based plant breeding, strategies are discussed for selecting a high-degree gene-pyramided line from among progeny of a multiparentally produced heterozygous plant (root genotype). A strategy with combined use of haplo-diploidization and crossing between selected plants will be highly efficient; selection starts with haplo-diploidized plants raised from the root genotype, and in the absence of a plant with the objective marker genotype, two plants with the best complementary genotypes are crossed to produce a hybrid, which in turn is haplo-diploidized for the next round of selection. In this strategy, even a plant having as many as 20 target markers can be obtained at an almost perfect certainty in about three rounds of selection with a maximum of 200 tested plants per round. When haplo-diploidized plants are unavailable, a plant with the most promising marker genotype should be selected and self-fertilized in each generation, or in the absence of any promising plant, two plants with the best complementary genotypes are crossed for the next round of selection. In this strategy, the number of tested plants in the first two generations counts when the markers are codominant, whereas the rounds of selection counts when the markers are dominant. Of various supplementary measures for this strategy, backcrossing the root genotype with one of the donors could be useful when the donor has more than 70% of all targeted markers.

Abbreviations: CGP, a pair of plants with complementary marker genotypes • CPP, a pair of plants with complementary marker phenotypes • CRO, expected number of crossings performed in a selection strategy • GEN, expected rounds of selection performed in a selection strategy • GNP, expected number of plants tested per selection round • HF2, a selection strategy with combined use of F2 enrichment and haplo-diploidization • IG, a plant with the objective homozygous marker genotype • PG, a plant with promising marker genotype • PP, a plant with promising marker phenotype • PRO, the probability of success; RHC, a selection strategy with recurrent use of haplo-diploidization and crossing between the best complementary genotypes • RSC, a recurrent selection strategy with selfing or crossing of selected plants • SH, a selection strategy with a single round of haplo-diploidization and selection • TPN, expected total number of tested plants in a selection strategy







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.