HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yang, C.-M. Articles by Hsu, F.-H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Yang, C.-M. Articles by Hsu, F.-H. Agricola Articles by Yang, C.-M. Articles by Hsu, F.-H. Related Collections Forage Management Other Forage Crops Crop Models

FORAGE & GRAZINGLANDS

Estimation of Forage Production of Nilegrass Using Vegetation Reflectance

^a Crop Science Division, Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Wufeng, Taichung Hsien 41301, Taiwan ROC
^b Forage Crops Division, Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Hsinhua, Tainan Hsien 71246, Taiwan ROC. This work was supported by the research grants (92AS-8.1.1-CI-C1, 93AS-8.1.1-CI- C1, and 94AS-8.2.1.-CI-C1) from Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan ROC

^* Corresponding author (cmyang{at}wufeng.tari.gov.tw).

Changes in reflectance spectrum of a crop are known to follow the morphological development of vegetation, and thus spectral models combining spectral characteristics correlated with biomass production may be used for yield estimation. Field experiments were conducted to validate use of reflectance spectra (350–2400 nm) to estimate forage production (i.e., aboveground fresh weight) of nilegrass (Acroceras macrum Stapf) vegetation from June 2002 to May 2004. Correlation coefficients (r) between spectral reflectance and forage production varied across the spectral range of measurements. A linear relationship (P < 0.010) was found for several wavebands, with the highest r value located at 891 nm (r = 0.671; P < 0.010). Of the examined spectral indices, forage production was found to be best correlated with R_GREEN/R_NIR ratio (R² = 0.654, P < 0.001) where R_GREEN was reflectance of green light (490–560 nm) maximum and R_NIR was reflectance of the near-infrared (740–1300 nm) peak. Assessment of forage production was further improved by using a multiple linear regression (MLR) model. The best five-variable linear regression equation provided the best fit (R² = 0.726, P < 0.001, Mallows' Cp criterion = 6.000). When validating the MLR model with other datasets from different growing seasons, the model gave reasonable prediction values (r = 0.833; P < 0.001) with a slope of 1.086 and root mean square error of 3.891 (N = 21).

Abbreviations: LAI, leaf area index • MLR, multiple linear regression • NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index • SC, spectral characteristic