Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 31 May 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:1151-1158 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ravishankar, P.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ravishankar, P.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ravishankar, P.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Root Development

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

The Effects of Light, Rehilling, and Mulching on Greenshoulder and Internal Greening in Carrots

P. Ravishankar, R.R. Lada*, C.D. Caldwell, S.K. Asiedu and A. Adams

Dep. of Plant and Animal Sciences, Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, NS Canada, B2N 5E3

* Corresponding author (rlada{at}nsac.ca).

Greenshoulder (GS) and internal greening (IG) in carrots (Daucus carota var. sativus) affect root appearance and can lead to significant economic loss. Experiments were conducted to quantify the critical light intensity that may trigger greening by exposing carrot hypocotyls to different light intensities. Chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll were measured. The effects of rehilling on GS and IG were measured in a 2-yr field study with eight treatments imposed at various stages of growth. Another experiment to confirm the effects of rehilling by etiolating various genotypes was also conducted. Leaf area index, internal and external greening, and IG length were measured. Increasing light intensity enhanced chlorophyll a and b linearly and significantly. The highest amount of chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll accumulation in hypocotyl occurred at the highest light intensity tested (320 µmol m–2 s–1). Rehilling reduced GS and IG significantly. However, the response varied significantly between seasons. In 2002, rehilling once at the early vegetative stage, initial bulking stage, or active bulking stage was effective in reducing GS and IG. In the 2003 field study, rehilling once at each of the three stages reduced GS and IG. Compared with the control, rehilling reduced GS by 10 to 21% and IG by 13 to 20%. Among the cultivars tested, mulching reduced GS only for Magno. The results suggest that GS and IG are induced at the hypoctoyl stage and that rehilling could reduce GS and IG considerably; however, the etiolation response appears to be genotype specific.

Abbreviations: CI, Chlorophyll index • CIAS, Computer Image Analysis System • DAE, days after emergence • DIFN, differential interception • GS, greenshoulder • IG, internal greening • LAI, leaf area index • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation • PLIG, percentage length of internal greening.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.