HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kelly, A. M. Articles by Cullis, B. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kelly, A. M. Articles by Cullis, B. R. Agricola Articles by Kelly, A. M. Articles by Cullis, B. R. Related Collections Statistics Crop Genetics Biometrics

CROP BREEDING & GENETICS

The Accuracy of Varietal Selection Using Factor Analytic Models for Multi-Environment Plant Breeding Trials

^a QDPI, Biometry, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
^b NSWDPI, Biometrics, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Inst., Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia
^c School of Physical Sciences, Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

^* Corresponding author (alison.kelly{at}dpi.qld.gov.au).

Modeling of cultivar x trial effects for multi-environment trials (METs) within a mixed model framework is now common practice in many plant breeding programs. The factor analytic (FA) model is a parsimonious form used to approximate the fully unstructured form of the genetic variance–covariance matrix in the model for MET data. In this study, we demonstrate that the FA model is generally the model of best fit across a range of data sets taken from early generation trials in a breeding program. In addition, we demonstrate the superiority of the FA model in achieving the most common aim of METs, namely the selection of superior genotypes. Selection is achieved using best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs) of cultivar effects at each environment, considered either individually or as a weighted average across environments. In practice, empirical BLUPs (E-BLUPs) of cultivar effects must be used instead of BLUPs since variance parameters in the model must be estimated rather than assumed known. While the optimal properties of minimum mean squared error of prediction (MSEP) and maximum correlation between true and predicted effects possessed by BLUPs do not hold for E-BLUPs, a simulation study shows that E-BLUPs perform well in terms of MSEP.

Abbreviations: BLUP, best linear unbiased prediction • E-BLUP, empirical best linear unbiased prediction • FA, factor analytic • MET, multi-environment trial • MSEP, mean squared error of prediction • US, unstructured variance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Burgueno, J. Crossa, P. L. Cornelius, and R.-C. Yang Using Factor Analytic Models for Joining Environments and Genotypes without Crossover Genotype x Environment Interaction Crop Sci., July 1, 2008; 48(4): 1291 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]