|
|
||||||||
a Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre (ECORC), Agric. and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0C6
b Dep. of Agronomy & Environ. Mgmt., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-2110
c Cereal Research Center (CRC), AAFC, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, R3T 2M9
d Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences and Dep. of Statistics, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506. ECORC contribution number: 06-688
* Corresponding author (yanw{at}agr.gc.ca).
The use of genotype main effect (G) plus genotype-by-environment (GE) interaction (G+GE) biplot analysis by plant breeders and other agricultural researchers has increased dramatically during the past 5 yr for analyzing multi-environment trial (MET) data. Recently, however, its legitimacy was questioned by a proponent of Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) analysis. The objectives of this review are: (i) to compare GGE biplot analysis and AMMI analysis on three aspects of genotype-by-environment data (GED) analysis, namely mega-environment analysis, genotype evaluation, and test-environment evaluation; (ii) to discuss whether G and GE should be combined or separated in these three aspects of GED analysis; and (iii) to discuss the role and importance of model diagnosis in biplot analysis of GED. Our main conclusions are: (i) both GGE biplot analysis and AMMI analysis combine rather than separate G and GE in mega-environment analysis and genotype evaluation, (ii) the GGE biplot is superior to the AMMI1 graph in mega-environment analysis and genotype evaluation because it explains more G+GE and has the inner-product property of the biplot, (iii) the discriminating power vs. representativeness view of the GGE biplot is effective in evaluating test environments, which is not possible in AMMI analysis, and (iv) model diagnosis for each dataset is useful, but accuracy gain from model diagnosis should not be overstated.
Abbreviations: AEC, average environment coordination AMMI, Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction G, genotype main effect GE, genotype-by-environment interaction GED, genotype-by-environment data (for a single trait) GGE, genotype main effect plus genotype-by-environment interaction IPC, interaction principal component MET, multi-environment trials NID, normally and independently distributed PC, principal component SREG, Sites (Environments) Regression model SVD, singular value decomposition SVP, singular value partitioning
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Sabaghnia, H. Dehghani, and S. H. Sabaghpour Graphic Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction for Lentil Yield in Iran Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 760 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Gauch Jr., H.-P. Piepho, and P. Annicchiarico Statistical Analysis of Yield Trials by AMMI and GGE: Further Considerations Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 866 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Putto, A. Patanothai, S. Jogloy, and G. Hoogenboom Determination of Mega-Environments for Peanut Breeding Using the CSM-CROPGRO-Peanut Model Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 973 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Journal of Environmental Quality |
||||