HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Provenza, F. D. Articles by Wiedmeier, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Provenza, F. D. Articles by Wiedmeier, R. D. Agricola Articles by Provenza, F. D. Articles by Wiedmeier, R. D. Related Collections Forage Management Ecosystem Management Grazing Management

SYMPOSIA

The Value to Herbivores of Plant Physical and Chemical Diversity in Time and Space

^a Wildland Resources, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-5230
^b Plant, Soils, and Biometeorology, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-4820
^c Animal, Dairy, and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-4810

^* Corresponding author (stan{at}cc.usu.edu)

Whether foraging on pastures or rangelands, herbivores encounter plant species that differ in their concentrations of nutrients. They also all contain various secondary compounds that at too high doses can be toxic, but at the appropriate dose many of these toxins may have medicinal benefits. The quantity of forage an animal consumes depends on the other forages it selects because nutrients and toxins interact. Food intake also depends on an individual's morphology and physiology, and marked variation is common, even among closely related animals, in needs for nutrients and abilities to cope with toxins. Thus, individuals can better meet their needs when offered a variety of foods that differ in nutrients and toxins than when constrained to a single food. Nonetheless, we have focused on a few species, often grown in monoculture, and we have reduced concentrations of secondary compounds with little appreciation for their roles in protecting plants against herbivores, pathogens, and competitors. In nature, where diversity of plants is the rule and not the exception, eating a variety of foods is how animals cope with, and may benefit from, secondary compounds. The potential benefits of creating mixtures of plant species whose nutrient and secondary compound profiles complement one another are obvious, though much remains to be learned about how to reconstruct agro-ecosystems with plants that complement and enhance one another structurally, functionally, and biochemically.

Abbreviations: BW, body weight • PEG polyethylene glycol • VFAs, volatile fatty acids • T, toxins • HQ, high-quality forage

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Forbey, A. L. Harvey, M. A. Huffman, F. D. Provenza, R. Sullivan, and D. Tasdemir Exploitation of secondary metabolites by animals: A response to homeostatic challenges Integr. Comp. Biol., September 1, 2009; 49(3): 314 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. D. Provenza What does it mean to be locally adapted and who cares anyway? J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E271 - E284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. Griggs Introduction to the CSSA Symposium--Beyond the Plant: Biodiversity Impacts on the Grazing Animal Crop Sci., February 6, 2007; 47(1): 380 - 381. [Full Text] [PDF]