Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 6 February 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:382-398 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Provenza, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wiedmeier, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Provenza, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wiedmeier, R. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Provenza, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wiedmeier, R. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Grazing Management

SYMPOSIA

The Value to Herbivores of Plant Physical and Chemical Diversity in Time and Space

F. D. Provenzaa,*, J. J. Villalbaa, J. Haskella, J. W. MacAdamb, T. C. Griggsb and R. D. Wiedmeierc

a Wildland Resources, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-5230
b Plant, Soils, and Biometeorology, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-4820
c Animal, Dairy, and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-4810

* Corresponding author (stan{at}cc.usu.edu)

Whether foraging on pastures or rangelands, herbivores encounter plant species that differ in their concentrations of nutrients. They also all contain various secondary compounds that at too high doses can be toxic, but at the appropriate dose many of these toxins may have medicinal benefits. The quantity of forage an animal consumes depends on the other forages it selects because nutrients and toxins interact. Food intake also depends on an individual's morphology and physiology, and marked variation is common, even among closely related animals, in needs for nutrients and abilities to cope with toxins. Thus, individuals can better meet their needs when offered a variety of foods that differ in nutrients and toxins than when constrained to a single food. Nonetheless, we have focused on a few species, often grown in monoculture, and we have reduced concentrations of secondary compounds with little appreciation for their roles in protecting plants against herbivores, pathogens, and competitors. In nature, where diversity of plants is the rule and not the exception, eating a variety of foods is how animals cope with, and may benefit from, secondary compounds. The potential benefits of creating mixtures of plant species whose nutrient and secondary compound profiles complement one another are obvious, though much remains to be learned about how to reconstruct agro-ecosystems with plants that complement and enhance one another structurally, functionally, and biochemically.

Abbreviations: BW, body weight • PEG polyethylene glycol • VFAs, volatile fatty acids • T, toxins • HQ, high-quality forage




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
F. D. Provenza
What does it mean to be locally adapted and who cares anyway?
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E271 - E284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. C. Griggs
Introduction to the CSSA Symposium--Beyond the Plant: Biodiversity Impacts on the Grazing Animal
Crop Sci., February 6, 2007; 47(1): 380 - 381.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.