Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 22 January 2007
Published in Crop Sci 47:193-199 (2007)
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McClellan, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Marx, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McClellan, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Marx, D. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McClellan, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Marx, D. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Turfgrass

TURFGRASS SCIENCE

Nutrient and Chemical Characterization of Aging Golf Course Putting Greens

Establishment and Rootzone Mixture Treatment Effects

Ty A. McClellana, Robert C. Shearmana,*, Roch E. Gaussoina, Martha Mamoa, Charles S. Wortmanna, Garald L. Horsta and David B. Marxb

a Dep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
b Dep. of Statistics, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

* Corresponding author (rshearman1{at}unl.edu)

Nutrient retention and dynamics with time in turfgrass sand-based rootzone mixtures (RZMs) are not well documented. This study was conducted to determine chemical properties of putting greens as impacted by (i) RZM, (ii) establishment (EST), and (iii) putting green age. United States Golf Association (USGA) specification greens were constructed and established with creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) sequentially from 1997 to 2000. Treatments included two RZMs [i.e., 80:20 (v–v) sand and sphagnum peat mixture and an 80:15:5 (v–v–v) sand, sphagnum peat, and soil] and two EST procedures (i.e., accelerated vs. controlled). The accelerated treatment received 2.6-, 3.0-, and 2.6-fold N, P, and K, respectively, when compared with the controlled treatment during the EST year. Soil samples were taken and analyzed annually. The RZM generally had no effect on soil chemical properties during the EST year or beyond. All but five of the chemical properties investigated were significantly greater for the accelerated treatment compared with the controlled during the EST year. Soil pH in the accelerated treatment was lower than the controlled treatment, pH 6.7 vs. 7.4. Establishment treatments did not have an effect on chemical properties beyond the EST year, except for Bray1-P. All soil chemical properties investigated, excluding pH and available K, decreased after the EST year, but began to increase several years later.

Abbreviations: CEC, cation exchange capacity • EST, establishment • RZM, rootzone mixture • TSS, total soluble salts • USGA, United States Golf Association







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Crop Science Society of America.