Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 21 November 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:2685-2691 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Léon, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Léon, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Léon, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biometrics
Right arrow Statistics

CROP BREEDING & GENETICS

Estimation of Breeding Values of Inbred Lines using Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) and Genetic Similarities

Andrea M. Bauer, Tobias C. Reetz and Jens Léon*

Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Univ. of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 5, D-53115 Bonn, Germany

* Corresponding author (j.leon{at}uni-bonn.de)

Effective selection of parental material is an essential requirement for breeding success. Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) allows integration of all available information including pedigree information. However, for breeding self-pollinating crops the widely used coefficient of coancestry has disadvantages especially when pedigree information is not complete. This study was conducted to determine if, in the prediction of BLUP values, coefficient of coancestry can be replaced by genetic similarities which were calculated from DNA marker data. Three selection strategies based on BLUP (BLUP[E] = including environmental effects, BLUP[E+A] = including environmental effects and pedigree data, BLUP[E+GS] = including environmental effects and genetic similarities) were compared to the commonly used selection among adjusted line means. We generated a "virtual" parental population where heritability and amount of missing data in the data were varied. A tight association between coefficient of coancestry and genetic similarities under roughly unbiased conditions indicates that genetic similarities could be used in BLUP of self-pollinating crops.

Abbreviations: BLUP, best linear unbiased prediction • BLUP(E), best linear unbiased prediction considering environmental effects • BLUP(E+A), best linear unbiased prediction considering environmental effects and pedigree information • BLUP(E+GS), best linear unbiased prediction considering environmental effects and genetic similarities • MME, mixed model equations • QTL, quantitative trait locus




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
H. P. Piepho
Ridge Regression and Extensions for Genomewide Selection in Maize
Crop Sci., June 26, 2009; 49(4): 1165 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Legarra, C. Robert-Granie, E. Manfredi, and J.-M. Elsen
Performance of Genomic Selection in Mice
Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 611 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.