Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 2 October 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:2396-2402 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by King, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, L. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by King, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, L. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Water Stress
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Genotypic Variation for Shoot N Concentration and Response to Water Deficits in Soybean

C. Andy King and Larry C. Purcell*

Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Arkansas, 1366 W. Altheimer Dr., Fayetteville, AR 72704

* Corresponding author (lpurcell{at}uark.edu)

For soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], reports differ as to the degree to which accumulation of shoot biomass and N are inhibited by water deficit (WD). Our first objective was to evaluate responses of shoot biomass and shoot N to WD for soybean genotypes from diverse genetic backgrounds. The second objective was to determine if the severity of WD affected the response of N accumulation relative to biomass accumulation among genotypes. In a 2-yr field study of 15 genotypes, shoot N concentrations ranged from 25 to 33 mg N kg–1 for plants from well-watered (WW) treatments harvested around 60 d after planting, and N2 fixation accounted for 68% of the N accumulated. Following a 16- to 22-d WD period, shoot N concentrations were similar to that of WW plants for genotypes with low WW N concentrations but decreased for genotypes with high WW N. As a result, the shoot N concentration range among genotypes decreased following WD stress. In a greenhouse study where essentially all of the plant N accumulated was from N2 fixation, shoot N concentration increased across a range of WD levels for six genotypes with low WW N concentrations but decreased for two genotypes with high WW N. These results indicate that changes in shoot N concentration in response to WD depend on both the inherent N concentration of a given genotype and the severity of the WD stress.

Abbreviations: FTSW, fraction of transpirable soil water • MG, maturity group • WD, water deficit • WW, well watered







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.