Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 2 October 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:2343-2347 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, T. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, T. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Crop Models

PERSPECTIVES

A Reminder of the Limitations in Using Beer's Law to Estimate Daily Radiation Interception by Vegetation

Thomas R. Sinclair*

Agronomy Physiology Lab., Univ. of Florida, P.O. Box 110965, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0965

* Corresponding author (trsincl{at}ifas.ufl.edu)

Radiation extinction coefficients for leaf canopies are often calculated using Beer's Law based on midday measurements of radiation interception. However, the assumption of Beer's Law is not appropriate for leaf canopies and this empirical approach needs to be used with caution. Alternatively, classic derivations of radiation interception by leaf canopies have resulted in a similar exponential form defined as a function of time of day, day of year, and latitude. A common experimental approach of determining the extinction coefficient from midday measurements results in a minimum coefficient that underpredicts the total daily radiation interception. Two approaches are explored to improve the estimates of daily radiation interception under a clear sky. The first approach compared extinction coefficients calculated for midday against ones calculated as representative of radiation interception over the entire day. A linear correlation was found between the two extinction coefficients so that the midday extinction coefficient could be corrected to obtain a coefficient representative of the entire day under a clear sky. The second approach estimated the time of day when measurements could be made to obtain directly an extinction coefficient representative of the entire day. While such times in the day could be identified, this approach is impractical because the periods for taking these measurements are short and dependent on leaf angle.

Abbreviations: G, leaf shadow projection • ki, instantaneous extinction coefficient • kd, daily extinction coefficient • L, leaf area index • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation • Rb, irradiance transmitted through the leaf canopy • Rbo, irradiance incident on the leaf canopy • {alpha}, leaf angle • ß, solar angle







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.