Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 25 July 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:1948-1954 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Peel, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Peel, M. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Peel, M. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Germplasm Enhancement
Right arrow Crop Genetics

CROP BREEDING & GENETICS

Genetic Variation in Dry Matter Production and Nutritional Characteristics of Meadow Bromegrass under Repeated Defoliation

Kevin B. Jensen*, J. G. Robins, Blair L. Waldron and Michael D. Peel

USDA-ARS, Forage and Range Research Lab., 695 North 1100 East., Logan, UT 84322-6300

* Corresponding author (kevin{at}cc.usu.edu)

Meadow bromegrass (Bromus riparius Rehm.) has gained interest as a highly productive pasture grass that can be used under management intensive grazing with limited irrigation. In 1999, 28 cloned parents and half-sib families of meadow bromegrass were each planted in a randomized complete block design to evaluate genetic variation of meadow bromegrass for dry matter yield (DMY) (Harvests 1 to 6), forage quality under repeated defoliation (Harvests 1, 3, and 5), and investigate intercharacter correlations. Narrow-sense heritability estimates and their standard errors for DMY at Harvests 2, 3, and 4 were 0.89 ± 0.32, 0.59 ± 0.28, and 0.53 ± 0.29, respectively. However, at Harvest 1 and 5, standard errors of the heritability estimates for DMY were equal to or greater than the estimates. All heritability estimates for crude protein (CP) were at least twice their standard errors at Harvests 1, 3, and 5. High narrow-sense heritabilities at Harvest 5 for acid detergent fiber (ADF) suggest that selection on forage harvested later in the growing season might be more efficient than forage harvested earlier in the season. Combined across years and within harvests, narrow-sense heritability estimates and standard errors for neutral detergent fiber (NDF) were 0.66 ± 0.29, 0.47 ± 0.30, and 0.71 ± 0.28, respectively. Based on correlations, it seems reasonable to assume that when selecting for increased DMY that ADF and NDF will increase and that CP and IVTD will decrease in this population.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.