Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 18 May 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:1488-1500 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gauch, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gauch, H. G., Jr.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gauch, H. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Statistics
Right arrow Biometrics

REVIEW & INTERPRETATION

Statistical Analysis of Yield Trials by AMMI and GGE

Hugh G. Gauch, Jr.*

Crop and Soil Sciences, 519 Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

* Corresponding author (hgg1{at}cornell.edu)

The Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) model, Genotype main effects and Genotype x Environment interaction (GGE) model, and Principal Components Analysis (PCA) are singular value decomposition (SVD) based statistical analyses often applied to yield-trial data. This paper presents a systematic comparison, using both statistical theory and empirical investigations, while considering both current practices and best practices. Agricultural researchers using these analyses face two inevitable choices. First is the choice of a model for visualizing data. AMMI is decidedly superior, not for statistical reasons, but rather for agricultural reasons. AMMI partitions the overall variation into genotype main effects, environment main effects, and genotype x environment interactions. These three sources of variation present agricultural researchers with different challenges and opportunities, so it is best to handle them separately, while still considering all three in an integrated manner. Second is the choice of a member of a given model family for gaining predictive accuracy. AMMI, GGE, and other SVD-based model families are essentially equivalent, but best practices require model diagnosis for each individual dataset to determine which member is most predictively accurate. Making these two choices well allows researchers to extract more usable information from their data, thereby increasing efficiency and accelerating progress.

Abbreviations: AEC, average environment coordinate • AIC, Akaike information criterion • AMMI, Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction • AOV, analysis of variance • ATC, average tester (genotype) coordinate • BIC, Bayesian information criterion • df, degrees of freedom • GE, genotype x environment • GE', prime, signal-rich part of the interaction • GE*, spurious, noise-rich part of the interaction • GGE, Genotype main effects and Genotype x Environment interaction • PC, principal component • PCA, principal components analysis • SS, sum of squares • SVD, singular value decomposition




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
H. G. Gauch Jr., H.-P. Piepho, and P. Annicchiarico
Statistical Analysis of Yield Trials by AMMI and GGE: Further Considerations
Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 866 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. Putto, A. Patanothai, S. Jogloy, and G. Hoogenboom
Determination of Mega-Environments for Peanut Breeding Using the CSM-CROPGRO-Peanut Model
Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 973 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S. Ceretta and F. van Eeuwijk
Grain Yield Variation in Malting Barley Cultivars in Uruguay and Its Consequences for the Design of a Trials Network
Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 167 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
Y.-G. Cho, H.-J. Kang, J.-S. Lee, Y.-T. Lee, S.-J. Lim, H. Gauch, M.-Y. Eun, and S. R. McCouch
Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci in Rice for Yield, Yield Components, and Agronomic Traits across Years and Locations
Crop Sci., November 7, 2007; 47(6): 2403 - 2417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J.-L. Laffont, M. Hanafi, and K. Wright
Numerical and Graphical Measures to Facilitate the Interpretation of GGE Biplots
Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 990 - 996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R.-C. Yang
Mixed-Model Analysis of Crossover Genotype-Environment Interactions
Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1051 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. Yan, M. S. Kang, B. Ma, S. Woods, and P. L. Cornelius
GGE Biplot vs. AMMI Analysis of Genotype-by-Environment Data
Crop Sci., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 643 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.