|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crop and Soil Sciences, 519 Bradfield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
* Corresponding author (hgg1{at}cornell.edu)
The Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) model, Genotype main effects and Genotype x Environment interaction (GGE) model, and Principal Components Analysis (PCA) are singular value decomposition (SVD) based statistical analyses often applied to yield-trial data. This paper presents a systematic comparison, using both statistical theory and empirical investigations, while considering both current practices and best practices. Agricultural researchers using these analyses face two inevitable choices. First is the choice of a model for visualizing data. AMMI is decidedly superior, not for statistical reasons, but rather for agricultural reasons. AMMI partitions the overall variation into genotype main effects, environment main effects, and genotype x environment interactions. These three sources of variation present agricultural researchers with different challenges and opportunities, so it is best to handle them separately, while still considering all three in an integrated manner. Second is the choice of a member of a given model family for gaining predictive accuracy. AMMI, GGE, and other SVD-based model families are essentially equivalent, but best practices require model diagnosis for each individual dataset to determine which member is most predictively accurate. Making these two choices well allows researchers to extract more usable information from their data, thereby increasing efficiency and accelerating progress.
Abbreviations: AEC, average environment coordinate AIC, Akaike information criterion AMMI, Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction AOV, analysis of variance ATC, average tester (genotype) coordinate BIC, Bayesian information criterion df, degrees of freedom GE, genotype x environment GE', prime, signal-rich part of the interaction GE*, spurious, noise-rich part of the interaction GGE, Genotype main effects and Genotype x Environment interaction PC, principal component PCA, principal components analysis SS, sum of squares SVD, singular value decomposition
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. G. Gauch Jr., H.-P. Piepho, and P. Annicchiarico Statistical Analysis of Yield Trials by AMMI and GGE: Further Considerations Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 866 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Putto, A. Patanothai, S. Jogloy, and G. Hoogenboom Determination of Mega-Environments for Peanut Breeding Using the CSM-CROPGRO-Peanut Model Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 973 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ceretta and F. van Eeuwijk Grain Yield Variation in Malting Barley Cultivars in Uruguay and Its Consequences for the Design of a Trials Network Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 167 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-G. Cho, H.-J. Kang, J.-S. Lee, Y.-T. Lee, S.-J. Lim, H. Gauch, M.-Y. Eun, and S. R. McCouch Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci in Rice for Yield, Yield Components, and Agronomic Traits across Years and Locations Crop Sci., November 7, 2007; 47(6): 2403 - 2417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Laffont, M. Hanafi, and K. Wright Numerical and Graphical Measures to Facilitate the Interpretation of GGE Biplots Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 990 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-C. Yang Mixed-Model Analysis of Crossover Genotype-Environment Interactions Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1051 - 1062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yan, M. S. Kang, B. Ma, S. Woods, and P. L. Cornelius GGE Biplot vs. AMMI Analysis of Genotype-by-Environment Data Crop Sci., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 643 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |