Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 18 May 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:1479-1487 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duggan, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Duggan, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, D. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Duggan, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, D. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions

CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM

Yield Structure and Kernel Potential of Winter Wheat on the Canadian Prairies

B. L. Duggana and D. B. Fowlerb,*

a Oregon State University, Central Oregon Agricultural Research Center, 850 N.W. Dogwood Lane, Madras, OR 97741
b Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada

* Corresponding author (Brian.Fowler{at}usask.ca)

Improvements in agronomic practices and cultivars have allowed for expanded production of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on the Canadian prairies. In this study, yield and yield components were measured in dry land and irrigation trials to identify the factors determining yield potential and sample uniformity. Although genotype x environment interactions were important contributors to variation in the yield determining factors, genotype and position of the kernel in the spike had the major influence on kernel weight. Large differences in kernels spikelet–1 and kernel weight indicated that these two variables were responsible for yield adjustments to stress during the spikelet and kernel development phase. Kernels from the lower and middle section of the spike and the proximal (A and B) floret positions were heavier than those from the upper spike section and the distal (C and D) floret positions. Artificially reducing spikelet numbers increased weight of the remaining kernels but only under dry land conditions. Weight of kernels in the C position was increased 22% when ovules of the proximal florets were removed during head initiation. These observations indicate that because growing season moisture availability is extremely variable on the Canadian prairies, an ability to compensate for limitations or excesses in sink size as the season progresses must be bred into cultivars if grain yield is to be maximized. This means that successful genotypes tend to have higher than average values for all yield components rather than one exceptionally high component and uniform seed size is difficult to achieve.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.