Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 25 April 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:1331-1335 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isleib, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Novitzky, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Isleib, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Novitzky, W. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Isleib, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Novitzky, W. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biometrics
Right arrow Other Crops

CROP BREEDING & GENETICS

Partial Dominance, Pleiotropism, and Epistasis in the Inheritance of the High-Oleate Trait in Peanut

T. G. Isleiba,*, R. F. Wilsonb and W. P. Novitzkyc

a Dep. of Crop Science, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7629
b USDA-ARS National Program Staff, 5601 Sunnyside Ave., GWCC-BLTSVL, Beltsville, MD 20705
c USDA-ARS Soybean and Biological Nitrogen Fixation Group, N.C. State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620

* Corresponding author (tom_isleib{at}ncsu.edu)

Earlier reports of the high-oleate (low-linoleate) trait in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) indicated that it was controlled by completely dominant gene action. However, linoleate content intermediate to that in low- and normal-linoleate seeds was found among progeny when the trait was backcrossed into five virginia-type cultivars, suggesting partial dominance of the gene controlling the trait. Although BC1F2 results were inconsistent across recurrent parents, data from the BC2F2 and BC3F2 populations of all crosses conformed to the 1:2:1 ratio expected under partial dominance. Quantitative analysis showed that fatty acid levels were affected by the background genotypes of the recurrent parents, suggesting that there are other genes that influence fatty acid. The ol gene exhibited pleiotropism by influencing not only oleate and linoleate, but also levels of palmitate, total C18 fatty acids, gadoleate, and total saturated fatty acids. The effects of the ol gene interacted with background genotype, particularly with the additive genetic contrast, suggesting epistasis in the general sense. Progeny testing of 59 putatively heterozygous and 41 homozygous normal BC2F2 plants indicated that the two genotypes could be distinguished accurately on the basis of linoleate level, suggesting that the ol gene can be moved by backcrossing using techniques appropriate for a dominant trait rather than a recessive trait.

Abbreviations: O/L ratio, ratio of the concentration of oleate to linoleate







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.