Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 March 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:1137-1142 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helms, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Helms, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Helms, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Biometrics

CROP BREEDING & GENETICS

Genetic Gain Equation with Correlated Genotype x Environment Effects

T. C. Helms* and J. J. Hammond

Dep. of Plant Sci., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105

* Corresponding author (ted.helms{at}ndsu.edu)

The genetic gain formula has been used to determine the best allocation of resources. The assumptions of this formula are that genotypes are selected based on the mean of data averaged across several locations within years. When plant breeders select genotypes after the first year of replicated yield tests, the assumptions of the genetic gain formula are violated. For this reason, information provided by the genetic gain formula is not useful for determining the optimum allocation of replicates and environments. Our objectives were to (i) develop a heritability formula that included covariances between genotype-by-environment (G x E) interaction effects for the same genotype evaluated in different environments; and (ii) show how these G x E covariances influence resource allocation strategies to maximize genetic gain. Our operational genetic gain formula considers genetic gain to be a correlated response between the test and target environments and allows for G x E covariances between the same genotype evaluated at two selection sites. When selection was conducted at two sites that had a small G x E component of variance and also conducted at two sites with a large G x E component of variance, the realized gain was equal in the target environments. Optimal resource allocation cannot be decided, based on the genetic gain formula.

Abbreviations: G x E, genotype-by-environment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H.-P. Piepho and J. Mohring
Computing Heritability and Selection Response From Unbalanced Plant Breeding Trials
Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1881 - 1888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.