Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 March 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:1081-1087 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tecle, I. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Pell, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tecle, I. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Pell, A. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tecle, I. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Pell, A. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Genetics
Right arrow Alfalfa

CROP BREEDING & GENETICS

Response from Selection for Pectin Concentration and Indirect Response in Digestibility of Alfalfa

Isaak Y. Teclea, Donald R. Viandsa,*, Julie L. Hansena and Alice N. Pellb

a Dep. of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853
b Dep. of Animal Science, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853

* Corresponding author (drv3{at}cornell.edu)

Genetic improvement of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) for increased pectin concentration, estimated by neutral detergent soluble fiber (NDSF), would improve the efficiency of utilization of its high protein and digestibility by ruminants. The objectives of this study were to: (i) estimate the realized direct response from one cycle of phenotypic selection for NDSF concentration; (ii) evaluate association of NDSF concentration with other forage quality traits, and; (iii) determine the impact of selection for NDSF concentration on in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) of alfalfa. Selection for NDSF was applied to five alfalfa populations from 1996 to 2000 and synthetic generation two seed was produced. Progress from selection for NDSF concentration was evaluated in plot trials for 2 or 3 yr at two locations near Ithaca, NY. Populations divergently selected for NDSF were 1.62 to 5.15 g kg–1 of dry matter (DM) higher and 2.26 to 4.20 g kg–1 DM lower, respectively, than their respective base populations. Neutral detergent soluble fiber concentration was negatively correlated with total cell wall concentration (CW), and proportions of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), cellulose, and lignin in the CW. A positive correlation existed between NDSF concentration and crude protein (CP) concentration and IVDMD. Populations bred for higher or lower NDSF concentration had 0.20 to 8.82 g kg–1 DM higher IVDMD and 0.63 to 15.06 g kg–1 DM lower IVDMD than their respective base populations. Selection for NDSF concentration and indirectly for CP, total CW concentration and composition, and IVDMD of alfalfa forage was successful.

Abbreviations: ADF, acid detergent fiber • ADL, acid detergent lignin • CEL, cellulose • CELCW, proportion of cellulose in the cell wall • CP, crude protein • CW, total cell wall • DM, dry matter • EIR, ethanol insoluble residue • EIRCP, ethanol insoluble residue crude protein • EIROM, ethanol insoluble residue organic matter • IVDMD, in vitro dry matter digestibility • HC, hemicellulose • HCCW, proportion of hemicellulose in the cell wall • NIRS, near infrared reflectance spectroscopy • NDF, neutral detergent fiber • NDFCP, neutral detergent fiber crude protein • NDSF, neutral detergent-soluble fiber • NDSFCW, proportion of NDSF in the cell wall







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.