Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 24 February 2006
Published in Crop Sci 46:751-757 (2006)
© 2006 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hooks, T.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hooks, T.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, K. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hooks, T.
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, K. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sorghum
Right arrow Data Management
Right arrow Plant Genetic Resources

PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES

Variation in the U.S. Photoperiod Insensitive Sorghum Collection for Chemical and Nutritional Traits

Tisha Hooksa, J. F. Pedersenb,*, D. B. Marxa and K. P. Vogelb

a Dep. of Statistics, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583
b USDA-ARS, NPA Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research, 344 Keim Hall, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0937

* Corresponding author (jfp{at}unlserve.unl.edu)

Screening germplasm for chemical and nutritional content can be expensive and time consuming. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and application of geostatistical models can make screening more efficient. The objectives of this study were to utilize these technologies to: (i) generate chemical and nutritional values for the U.S. photoperiod insensitive sorghum collection, (ii) describe variability for those traits, (iii) identify accessions in the highest and lowest 1% for each trait, and (iv) describe relationships among the accessions. Accessions were grown at Ithaca, NE, during 2001 and 2002. Samples of grain were scanned and NIRS equations developed for starch, fat, crude protein, acid detergent fiber, and phosphorus. The NIRS generated values for each accession can be accessed on GRIN at http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/desclist.pl?69 ; verified 22 November 2005. The highest and lowest 1% of accessions was identified for each trait by best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs). Means and standard deviations for observed values and variances due to accessions were calculated. Rank correlations between BLUPs and observed values ranged from r = 0.82 to r = 0.92. Principal component analysis showed that much of the variation is attributable to a contrast of starch with a weighted average of fat, crude protein, acid detergent fiber, and phosphorus. Cluster analyses showed clusters on the basis of canonical values, but no geographical, taxonomical, or morphological interpretation of the clusters was apparent.

Abbreviations: ADF, acid detergent fiber • BLUPs, best linear unbiased predictors • Ca, calcium • CP, crude protein • GRIN, Germplasm Resources Information Network • NIRS, near infrared spectroscopy • P, phosphorus • SEC, standard error calibration • SECV, standard error cross validation







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the Crop Science Society of America.