HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mulkey, V. R. Articles by Lee, D. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Mulkey, V. R. Articles by Lee, D. K. Agricola Articles by Mulkey, V. R. Articles by Lee, D. K. Related Collections Other Forage Crops Biofuels

FORAGE & GRAZINGLANDS

Management of Switchgrass-Dominated Conservation Reserve Program Lands for Biomass Production in South Dakota

^a 7049 Grayson Turnpike, Speedwell, VA 24374
^b Plant Science Dep., South Dakota State University, 247 NPB, Box 2140-C, Brookings, SD 57007-2141

^* Corresponding author (vance.owens{at}sdstate.edu)

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) has been planted on land enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). Management strategies for conversion of this land from CRP to biomass energy require evaluation. Objectives of this study were to: (i) determine the effect of harvest timing and N rate on biomass production and characteristics of switchgrass land enrolled in or managed similarly to CRP and (ii) evaluate the impact of harvest management on species composition and persistence. Five N rates (spring applications of 0, 56, 112, and 224 kg ha^–1 and 224 kg ha^–1 split between spring and postharvest) and two harvest timings (anthesis and post-killing frost) were applied to plots from 2001 to 2003 at three South Dakota locations. Harvesting after a killing frost produced higher total yields and improved switchgrass persistence compared with anthesis harvests. The concentration of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) increased between anthesis and killing-frost harvests, while total nitrogen (TN) and ash decreased. Nitrogen applied at 56 kg ha^–1 increased total biomass without affecting switchgrass persistence, but there was no additional benefit with N above 56 kg ha^–1. Harvesting long-established switchgrass stands once per year after a killing frost and applying N at 56 kg ha^–1 was an effective system for switchgrass biomass production and persistence on land enrolled in or managed similarly to CRP in South Dakota.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Haque, F. M. Epplin, and C. M. Taliaferro Nitrogen and Harvest Frequency Effect on Yield and Cost for Four Perennial Grasses Agron. J., November 1, 2009; 101(6): 1463 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Anex, L. R. Lynd, M. S. Laser, A. H. Heggenstaller, and M. Liebman Potential for Enhanced Nutrient Cycling through Coupling of Agricultural and Bioenergy Systems Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1327 - 1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. K. Lee, V. N. Owens, and J. J. Doolittle Switchgrass and Soil Carbon Sequestration Response to Ammonium Nitrate, Manure, and Harvest Frequency on Conservation Reserve Program Land Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 462 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]