|
|
||||||||
U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, ARS-USDA, 1925 Linden Drive West, Madison, WI 53705
* Corresponding author (mlsulliv{at}wisc.edu)
Many forages experience significant proteolytic losses when preserved by ensiling. Such losses in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) are especially high, with degradation of 44 to 87% of the forage protein to nonprotein N (NPN). In contrast, red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) has up to 90% less proteolysis during ensiling. Here we demonstrate that the combination of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and o-diphenol PPO substrates, both abundantly present in red clover, is responsible for postharvest proteolytic inhibition in this forage crop. Proteolysis in red clover leaf extracts increased nearly fivefold when endogenous o-diphenols were removed by gel filtration but returned to starting levels by adding back an exogenous o-diphenol. Proteolysis in leaf extracts of red clover plants silenced for PPO expression was dramatically increased compared to control plants. Leaf extracts of transgenic alfalfa expressing a red clover PPO gene showed a nearly fivefold o-diphenoldependent decrease in proteolysis compared to those of control alfalfa. We also demonstrate that PPO levels 10- to 20-fold lower than those typically found in red clover are sufficient for proteolytic inhibition, that as little as 0.25 µmol o-diphenol mg1 protein has a substantial impact on proteolysis, that a wide variety of o-diphenols are functional substrates in proteolytic inhibition, and that proteolysis is reduced for PPO-expressing alfalfa in small-scale ensiling experiments. Together, these results indicate that PPO and o-diphenols can be an effective treatment to prevent protein loss in ensiled forage crops.
Abbreviations: bp, base pair DM, dry matter FW, fresh weight nkat, nanokatal NPN, nonprotein N PPO, polyphenol oxidase RNAi, RNA interference TCA, trichloroacetic acid
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. H. Grabber Mechanical Maceration Divergently Shifts Protein Degradability in Condensed-Tannin vs. o-Quinone Containing Conserved Forages Crop Sci., March 19, 2008; 48(2): 804 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Journal of Environmental Quality |
||||