HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cherney, D. J. R. Articles by Cherney, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cherney, D. J. R. Articles by Cherney, J. H. Agricola Articles by Cherney, D. J. R. Articles by Cherney, J. H. Related Collections Forage Management Other Fiber Crops

FORAGE & GRAZINGLANDS

Influence of Grass Species and Sample Preparation on Ensiling Characteristics

^a Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA 14853
^b Universitá Degli Studi Di Palermo, Italy

^* Corresponding author (djc6{at}cornell.edu)

Laboratory silos are considered a practical method of comparing a number of treatments and are necessary when evaluating numerous experimental variables and their interactions involving different grass silages. Objectives of this study were to evaluate the suitability of grasses ensiled in vacuum-sealed polyethylene bags to assess treatment differences. Four field replicates of three grass species, orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L., OG), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L., RG), and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb., TF), harvested at two dates were ensiled whole or chopped. Bacterially inoculated grass samples (500 g) were ensiled for 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, or 30 d. At 30-d post ensiling, lactic acid was the predominant acid, suggesting good fermentation. Differences were noted among species, harvest date, and chop, suggesting that the polyethylene bag is sensitive to treatment differences. There was little or no butyric or propionic acids in the silages, indicating that the silages did not undergo clostridial fermentation. Ensiled grasses dropped rapidly in pH and were stable beyond 4 d for all treatments. Despite species and processing differences, pH of all silages tended to be under 4.7, considered acceptable for grass silages. We conclude that it is possible to use vacuum-sealed plastic bags to ensile temperate grasses to assess treatment differences.

Abbreviations: ADF, acid detergent fiber • CP, crude protein • DM, dry matter • NDF, neutral detergent fiber • NDFD, neutral detergent fiber digestibility • NSC, non-structural carbohydrates • OG, orchardgrass • RG, reed canarygrass • TF, tall fescue • VFA, volatile fatty acid • IVTD, in vitro true digestibility

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. A. Phillips, B. N. Northup, and B. C. Venuto Dry Matter Intake and Digestion of Perennial and Annual Cool-Season Grasses by Sheep Professional Animal Scientist, October 1, 2009; 25(5): 610 - 618. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. Kammes, G. B. H. Heemink, K. A. Albrecht, and D. K. Combs Utilization of Kura Clover-Reed Canarygrass Silage Versus Alfalfa Silage by Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2008; 91(8): 3138 - 3144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]