Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 2 December 2005
Published in Crop Sci 46:192-201 (2006)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piepho, H.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Möhring, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Piepho, H.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Möhring, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Piepho, H.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Möhring, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biometrics
Right arrow Experiment Design
Right arrow Statistics

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Selection in Cultivar Trials—Is It Ignorable?

Hans-Peter Piepho* and Jens Möhring

Bioinformatics Unit, Institut für Pflanzenbau und Grünland, Universität Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany

* Corresponding author (piepho{at}uni-hohenheim.de)

Crop cultivar registration requires multienvironment trials for assessing the value for cultivation and use (VCU). The series of trials usually extends across 3 yr, with some cultivars being discarded each year. Selection gives rise to a missing-data or drop-out pattern that is not completely random. The present paper studies the effect of drop-out on the validity of mixed model procedures such as REML and BLUP. It is shown on the basis of the pertinent statistical theory and simulations that selection is ignorable providing that all data used in the selection process are included in the analysis. Simulations show that REML is preferable to ML and BLUP is preferable to BLUE. It is suggested that cultivar registration authorities can benefit from multivariate mixed model analyses comprising all traits on which selection is based.

Abbreviations: BLUE, best linear unbiased estimation • BLUP, best linear unbiased prediction • MAR, missing at random • MCAR, missing completely at random • ML, maximum likelihood • MNAR, missing not at random • MSE, mean squared error • REML, restricted (residual) maximum likelihood • VCU, value for cultivation and use







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.