Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 2 December 2005
Published in Crop Sci 46:1-5 (2006)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Crop Genetics

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Early Generation Testing in Upland Cotton

Darren G. Jonesa,* and C. Wayne Smithb

a Monsanto, 4006 Old Leland Rd., Leland, MS 38756
b Dep. of Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M University, 2474 TAMUS, College Station, TX 77843-2474

* Corresponding author: darren.g.jones{at}monsanto.com

Early generation testing (EGT) is often used to identify segregating populations that are expected to contain the greatest frequency of favorable genotypes and to eliminate inferior populations with limited promise. The goal of this study was to determine if EGT methods utilized in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at College Station (CS) and Weslaco (WS), TX, since 1990 and 1992, respectively, and through 2002, could be used to predict advanced strain performance. Data were collected from 283 unique F2 populations at CS and 146 unique F2 and F3 populations at WS. Correlations of F2 population yield and individual plant selection fiber data suggests that the method used at CS limits the use of EGT for lint yield, yet enhances the use of EGT for the highly heritable fiber traits. Conversely, correlations of F2 population yield and population fiber data suggest that the method used at WS supports EGT for lint yield, but limits the use of EGT for fiber traits. However, by using F3 population fiber yield means and individual plant selection fiber data, EGT is validated at WS. Also, correlations of F2 yield and fiber data with combined yield and fiber data of advanced strains in standard performance trials across multiple locations in central and south Texas indicated that EGT reasonably predicted advanced generation performance.

Abbreviations: CC, Corpus Christi • CH, Chillicothe, CH • CS, College Station • DL, Dallas • DP50, Deltapine 50 • EGT, early generation testing • TH, Thrall • UV, Uvalde • WS, Weslaco







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.