HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schillinger, W. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schillinger, W. F. Agricola Articles by Schillinger, W. F. Related Collections Tillage Crop Growth and Development Dryland Cropping Systems Plant and Environment Interactions Plant and Soil Interactions

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

Tillage Method and Sowing Rate Relations for Dryland Spring Wheat, Barley, and Oat

Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State Univ., Dryland Research Station, P.O. Box B, Lind, WA 99341

^* Corresponding author (schillw{at}wsu.edu)

Some farmers in the Inland Pacific Northwest (PNW) have reported lower grain yield of spring cereals with no-till (NT) compared with conservation tillage (CT). A 4-yr field study was conducted in a 300-mm annual precipitation zone to determine tillage method and sowing rate effects on seed-zone water, seed-zone temperature, plant stand, grain yield, grain yield components, and straw production for three spring-sown cereal species. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and oat (Avena sativa L.) were sown at 120, 200, and 280 seeds m^–2 in a split plot design with NT and CT as main plots and sowing rate x cereal species combinations as subplots. Factors other than tillage method (i.e., drill, sowing date, fertilizer rate, sowing depth) were held constant. There were no differences in plant stand between NT and CT, but grain yield was reduced by 5% in NT in part because of less water in the seed zone compared with CT during early plant development. Disruption of capillary continuity with CT appeared to restrict upward movement of water, resulting in greater retention of water in the seed zone underlying the depth of tillage. Grain yield was not affected by sowing rate for any crop species because increased number of heads per unit area (HPU) and kernels per head (KPH) consistently compensated for reduced plant stand density. With precise seed placement, sowing rate of spring cereals can be reduced by 50% or more from rates commonly used.

Abbreviations: C, crop species • CT, conservation tillage • DWP, days without precipitation • HPU, heads per unit area • KPH, kernels per head • KW, kernel weight • NT, no-till • PNW, Pacific Northwest • R, sowing rate • T, tillage method • WUE, water use efficiency • WW–SF, winter wheat–summer fallow • Y, year

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. Grandy, G. P. Robertson, and K. D. Thelen Do Productivity and Environmental Trade-offs Justify Periodically Cultivating No-till Cropping Systems? Agron. J., October 3, 2006; 98(6): 1377 - 1383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]