Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 October 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:2591-2597 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mian, M. A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mian, M. A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mian, M. A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Plant Genetic Resources

PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES

AFLP Diversity within and among Hardinggrass Populations

M. A. Rouf Miana,*, John C. Zwonitzerb, Yiwu Chenc, Malay C. Sahab and Andrew A. Hopkinsb

a USDA-ARS, 1680 Madison Avenue, Wooster, OH 44691
b Forage Improvement Division, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401
c Dep. of Crop and Soil Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824

* Corresponding author (mian.3{at}osu.edu)

Little information is available on the genetic diversity of hardinggrass (Phalaris aquatica L.), a cool-season forage grass with potential for use in the southern Great Plains. The objective of this study was to determine the genetic diversity within and among 22 promising hardinggrass populations, including plant introductions (PIs), breeding populations, and one cultivar. Nine plants from each population (198 genotypes) were characterized with amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Genotypes were evaluated with nine selective primer combinations of fluorescent-labeled PstI and MseI primers, producing a total of 961 useful AFLP fragments. A high degree of genetic diversity was found, with a greater proportion of the diversity within (74%) rather than among (26%) populations. Clustering of populations on the basis of UPGMA closely followed the geographic origin and breeding history of the populations. Selections led to genetic shifts between two breeding populations, HG PI C1 and HG PI C2, although genetic diversity changed little if at all within these populations on the basis of polymorphism information content (PIC) scores of 0.22 versus 0.19, respectively. Two Moroccan PIs (PI 240248 and PI 517026) represent a distinct germplasm source on the basis of their genetic distances from other populations in the study. Genetic diversity data from this study will be helpful in grouping these accessions for development of breeding populations and various research purposes.

Abbreviations: AFLP, amplified fragment length polymorphism • AMOVA, Analysis of molecular variance • FID, Forage Improvement Division • MDS, multidimensional scaling • NPGS, USDA-National Plant Germplasm System • PI, plant introduction • PIC, polymorphism information content • RAPD, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA • RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism • SSR, simple sequence repeat • UPGMA, Unweighted Pair Group Method Using Arithmetic Averages







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.