HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sebolai, B. Articles by Boykin, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sebolai, B. Articles by Boykin, D. L. Agricola Articles by Sebolai, B. Articles by Boykin, D. L. Related Collections Spatial Distribution Germplasm Enhancement Field evaluation techniques

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Effect of Control Plot Density, Control Plot Arrangement, and Assumption of Random or Fixed Effects on Nonreplicated Experiments for Germplasm Screening Using Spatial Models

^a Botswana College of Agriculture, Private Bag 0027, Gaborone Botswana
^b USDA-ARS, NPA Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research, 344 Keim Hall, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0937
^c Dep. of Biometry, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 69583
^d USDA, ARS, MSA, 141 Experiment Stn. Rd., Stoneville, MS 38776

^* Corresponding author (jfp{at}unlserve.unl.edu)

Early generation selection experiments typically involve several hundred to thousands of lines. Various systematic and statistical techniques have been developed to increase effectiveness and efficiencies in such experiments, including the development and application of spatial statistical models. In this study, mixed model equations were used to provide least squares means (LSMEANs) and best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) and compare selection effectiveness and efficiencies to observed (Y) and true values in simulated experiments varying in size (10 x 10, 20 x 20 and 30 x 30 grids), control plots densities (0, 5, 10, 20, and 50%), control plot arrangements (high, medium, and low A-optimality), and spatial range of influence (short and long). Results were similar for all grid sizes. In experiments in which the simulated land areas were highly variable (short range), none of the predictors, Y, LSMEAN, or BLUP, were very effective in identifying the true superior genotypes. When the simulated land areas were less variable (long range), use of BLUPs consistently resulted in the highest proportion of true top ranking genotypes identified across all control plot densities, while using the observed values consistently resulted in identification of the lowest proportion of the true top ranking genotypes. Effectiveness of LSMEANs was dependent on control plot density and arrangements. Use of BLUPs for early generation germplasm screening experiments should result in a high effectiveness in selecting truly superior germplasm and high efficiency because of the ability to account for spatial variability with the use of few or no control plots.