HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brosnan, J. T. Articles by Dest, W. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Brosnan, J. T. Articles by Dest, W. M. Agricola Articles by Brosnan, J. T. Articles by Dest, W. M. Related Collections Turfgrass Management Turfgrass Plant and Environment Interactions

TURFGRASS SCIENCE

Characteristics in Diverse Wear Tolerant Genotypes of Kentucky Bluegrass

^a Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
^b Dep. of Plant, Soil and Insect Sciences, 12F Stockbridge Hall, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
^c Dep. of Plant Science, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269

^* Corresponding author (sebdon{at}pssci.umass.edu)

Evaluations of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) wear tolerance have been conducted; however, studies investigating wear mechanisms within this species is limited. This information would be valuable in selecting wear tolerant genotypes. The objective of this study was to identify anatomical and morphological characteristics in diverse wear tolerant Kentucky bluegrasses. Wear treatments were applied to the 2000 National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) Kentucky bluegrass field plots in the fall of 2002 at the University of Massachusetts Joseph Troll Turf Research Center at South Deerfield, MA. Wear treatments were applied to 173 genotypes with a differential slip-wear apparatus, and plots were visually rated for wear injury. The 10 most wear tolerant (TOL) and intolerant (INTOL) genotypes were selected for further evaluation. Twelve characteristics were measured in 2003 and 2004 comparing TOL and INTOL genotypes in field plots and as greenhouse grown spaced-plants. Characteristics included tiller density, shoot fresh weight and dry weight, shoot water content, leaf turgidity, number of leaves per shoot, leaf width, leaf strength, leaf angle, and leaf cell wall constituents [total cell wall content (TCW), hemicellulose, and lignocellulose]. Not all differences observed in the greenhouse were present in field plots. Significant differences were found between genotypes and TOL and INTOL groupings. No significant interaction with year was detected. Tolerant genotypes were associated with a more vertical leaf angle, greater TCW and lignocellulose content, and a lower shoot moisture content and leaf turgidity. Leaf angle was the single most important attribute separating wear TOL and INTOL genotypes. Biological explanation for the relationship between leaf orientation and wear tolerance is proposed. These characteristics may be useful as potential selection criteria for breeding to improve wear tolerance within this species.

Abbreviations: ADF, acid detergent fiber • ANOVA, analysis of variance • INTOL, wear intolerant genotypes • NDF, neutral detergent fiber • NTEP, national turfgrass evaluation program • TCW, total cell wall content • TOL, wear tolerant genotypes