HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in Crop Science Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Löffler, C. M. Articles by Cooper, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Löffler, C. M. Articles by Cooper, M. Agricola Articles by Löffler, C. M. Articles by Cooper, M. Related Collections Crop Genetics Maize Crop Models

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Classification of Maize Environments Using Crop Simulation and Geographic Information Systems

Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 7250 NW 62nd Ave., P.O. Box 552, Johnston, IA 50131

^* Corresponding author (carlos.loeffler{at}pioneer.com)

The effectiveness of a cultivar evaluation system largely depends on the genetic correlation between genotype performance in multienvironment trials (MET) and in the target population of environments (TPE). Previous classifications of maize (Zea mays L.) environments on the basis of climate and soil did not quantify their impact on the genetic correlations among environments. Consequently, plant breeders have favored classifications based on the similarity of cultivar discrimination in trials. However, these efforts frequently fail to provide adequate assessments of the TPE, since they require long-term performance data, which are not normally collected due to high cost. To describe the TPE, we performed crop simulations for each U.S. Corn Belt Township for the period 1952 through 2002, using standard CERES-Maize model inputs. To classify METs, input data were collected at or near the trial sites. Grain yield and biotic stress data for model confirmation were collected from 18 hybrids grown in replicated trials in 266 environments in 2000–2002. On the basis of prevailing conditions during key growth stages, and observed patterns of genotype x environment interactions (GEI), six major environment classes (EC) were identified. The relative frequency of each EC varied greatly from year to year and significant hybrid x EC interaction variance was observed. Our environmental classification system provided a useful description of some of the features of both the TPE and MET. Knowledge of the spatial (locations) and temporal (years) distributions of ECs that influence the incidence of GEI can be used to improve cultivar performance predictability in the U.S. Corn Belt TPE.

Abbreviations: APSIM, agricultural production systems simulator • AWC, available water capacity • CERES, crop environment resource synthesis • CRM, corn relative maturity • EC, environment class • ECB, European corn-borer (Ostrinia nubilalis H.) • GEI, genotype by environment interactions • GGE, genotype main effects plus genotype by environment interaction effects • GIS, geographic information system • MET, multienvironment trials • NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration • RCB, randomized complete block design • STATSGO, state soil geographic database • TPE, target population of environments

Related articles in Crop Science:

THIS ISSUE IN CROP SCIENCE

Crop Science 2005 45: x. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. A. Lee and M. Tollenaar Physiological Basis of Successful Breeding Strategies for Maize Grain Yield Crop Sci., December 18, 2007; 47(Supplement_3): S-202 - S-215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Boer, D. Wright, L. Feng, D. W. Podlich, L. Luo, M. Cooper, and F. A. van Eeuwijk A Mixed-Model Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Analysis for Multiple-Environment Trial Data Using Environmental Covariables for QTL-by-Environment Interactions, With an Example in Maize Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1801 - 1813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]