Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 24 June 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:1559-1564 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Grazing Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops

FORAGE & GRAZING LANDS

Grazing Tolerance of Cool-Season Grasses Planted as Seeded Sward Plots and Spaced Plants

Andrew A. Hopkins*

Forage Improvement Division, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401

* Corresponding author (aahopkins{at}noble.org)

Improved grazing tolerance is often an important goal in grass breeding programs. The objective of this research was to compare grazing tolerance of several cool-season perennial grasses planted as seeded sward plots and spaced plants. Cultivars or populations of smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.), orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), wheatgrass species (Thinopyrum spp.; Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) A. Love), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), and hardinggrass (Phalaris aquatica L.), were evaluated at Burneyville and Ardmore, OK, for 2 and 4 yr, respectively, as seeded sward plots and spaced plants. Following establishment, plots were grazed heavily (average of 6400 kg live weight ha–1) by cattle (Bos spp.) during spring and summer. Grazing tolerance was estimated each fall using survival as well as recovery scores for spaced plants and stand for seeded sward plots. Genotype x environment (GxE) interactions were prevalent, with the Burneyville site being more stressful for grass growth. Within an environment, recovery scores and survival of spaced plants were very similar, with rank correlations exceeding 0.81 (P < 0.05). As plantings became older, entries responded more similarly to heavy grazing across planting arrangements, with rank correlations between stand and survival exceeding 0.70 (P < 0.01) in some cases. ‘Barton’ western wheatgrass and ‘Paiute’ orchardgrass were consistently among the most and least grazing tolerant entries, respectively, regardless of planting arrangement. Thus, where seed supplies are limited, initial screening of accessions as spaced plants for 2 to 4 yr should allow breeders to identify cool-season grass germplasm that is potentially grazing tolerant. Subsequent evaluations in sward plots at multiple locations would be helpful in determining which populations to incorporate into a breeding program.

Abbreviations: E+, endophyte infected • E–, endophyte free • GxE, genotype by environment • KY-31, ‘Kentucky 31’ • rs, Spearman's rank correlation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. A. Hopkins and M. W. Alison
Stand Persistence and Animal Performance for Tall Fescue Endophyte Combinations in the South Central USA
Agron. J., August 3, 2006; 98(5): 1221 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.