Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 May 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:1410-1416 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willenborg, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Shirtliffe, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Willenborg, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Shirtliffe, S. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Willenborg, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Shirtliffe, S. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Weed Management
Right arrow Other Grain Crops
Right arrow Crop Ecology

CROP ECOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & QUALITY

Oat Caryopsis Size and Genotype Effects on Wild Oat–Oat Competition

Christian J. Willenborga, Brian G. Rossnagelb and Steven J. Shirtliffea,*

a Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A8
b Crop Development Center, Univ. of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A8

* Corresponding author (shirtliffe{at}usask.ca)

The inherent similarity between wild oat (Avena fatua L.) and oat (A. sativa L.) precludes selective herbicide control of wild oat. Previous studies have reported improved crop yield and competitiveness with the use of large seed. Therefore, a greenhouse experiment was conducted in 2002 and 2003 to examine the effect of caryopsis (dehulled kernel) size and genotype on wild oat–oat competition. Seeds of three oat cultivars (AC Assiniboia, CDC Boyer, CDC Orrin) were classified into three size classes based on caryopsis size (large, {approx}35 mg; medium, {approx}25 mg; and small, {approx}15 mg). Whole oat seeds of each genotype and caryopsis size treatment were grown either in monoculture or in mixture with wild oat (250 plants m–2). Neither genotype nor caryopsis size significantly influenced (P < 0.05) oat emergence. Nonetheless, oat plants established from large caryopses produced 17% more biomass (P < 0.001) and 15% more panicles m–2 (P < 0.001) than plants established from small caryopses. Wild oat produced 23% less biomass (P = 0.004) and fewer panicles m–2 when grown with oat plants established from large caryopses. Genotype only influenced oat panicle production (P = 0.05) and did not affect oat (P = 0.09) or wild oat (P = 0.34) aboveground shoot biomass production. These results suggest that oat plants derived from large-seeded caryopses may be better able to tolerate wild oat interference. However, further investigation is needed to examine the response of oat–wild oat competition to oat caryopsis size and genotype under field conditions.

Abbreviations: GDD, growing degree days • TGW, thousand-groat weight • TKW, thousand-kernel weight


Related articles in Crop Science:

THIS ISSUE IN CROP SCIENCE

Crop Science 2005 45: vii. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.