Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 May 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:1211-1215 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, K. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, K. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Cytology
Right arrow Crop Genetics
Right arrow Other Forage Crops

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Cytology and Fertility of Advanced Populations of Elymus lanceolatus (Scribn. & Smith) Gould x Elymus caninus (L.) L. Hybrids

Kevin B. Jensen*

USDA-ARS, Forage and Range Research Lab., Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-6300

* Corresponding author (kevin{at}cc.usu.edu)

Within the wheatgrasses and wildryes, amphiploids are frequently made as a means for introgressing desirable traits and restoring fertility in hybrids between diverse species. This study reports the cytology, fertility, and morphological characteristics of Elymus lanceolatus (Scribn. & Smith) Gould, E. caninus (L.) L., their F1 hybrids, advanced generations (F7 and F8), and three generations of advanced amphiploid progenies (C1, C2, and C3). Meiotic chromosome associations of E. lanceolatus and E. caninus are typical of allotetraploids. Chromosome pairing in the F1 hybrids suggests a close relationship between the two parents. Bivalent associations most frequently observed in the F7 and F8 were 14 bivalents. After multiple generations of harvesting available seed each generation from 10 plants, an increase in meiotic regularity was observed in the advanced F generations. Aneuploidy in the amphiploids (C generation) was observed in the C2 and C3 generations with chromosome numbers ranging from 47 to 56. The C1 generation had significantly fewer univalents per cell than the C2 and C3 generations. Combined across chromosome numbers, there was a significant decrease in the number of bivalents from 22.48 to 21.36 to 20.27 in each succeeding C generation, respectively. After seven generations of seed increase, pollen stainability increased from less than 1% in the F1 hybrid to 87 and 85% in the F7 and F8 generations, respectively. Chromosome doubling significantly reduced pollen stainability in the C1, C2, and C3 generations as compared to the parents and advanced F generations. Cluster analysis was able to separate the parents and the different hybrid populations.


Related articles in Crop Science:

THIS ISSUE IN CROP SCIENCE

Crop Science 2005 45: vii. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. A. Hopkins and T. L. Rowland
Rapid Flowering under Greenhouse Conditions and Lack of Awns Are Widespread among Tetraploid Elymus Species
Crop Sci., July 1, 2008; 48(4): 1482 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
K. B. Jensen, K. W. Maughan, and K. H. Asay
Characterization of Amphiploid Hybrids between Bluebunch and Thickspike Wheatgrasses
Crop Sci., February 1, 2006; 46(2): 655 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.