HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tarr, A. B. Articles by Dixon, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Tarr, A. B. Articles by Dixon, P. M. Agricola Articles by Tarr, A. B. Articles by Dixon, P. M. Related Collections Grazing Management Stochastic Processes Other Integrated Systems

FORAGE & GRAZING LANDS

Spectral Reflectance as a Covariate for Estimating Pasture Productivity and Composition

^a USDA-NASS, Des Moines, IA 50309
^b Dep. of Statistics, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011

^* Corresponding author (Alison_Tarr{at}nass.usda.gov)

Pasturelands are inherently variable. It is this variability that makes sampling as well as characterizing an entire pasture difficult. Measurement of plant canopy reflectance with a ground-based radiometer offers an indirect, rapid, and noninvasive characterization of pasture productivity and composition. The objectives of this study were (i) to determine the relationships between easily collected canopy reflectance data and pasture biomass and species composition and (ii) to determine if the use of pasture reflectance data as a covariate improved mapping accuracy of biomass, percentage of grass cover, and percentage of legume cover across three sampling schemes in a central Iowa pasture. Reflectance values for wavebands most highly correlated with biomass, percentage of grass cover, and percentage of legume cover were used as covariates. Cokriging was compared with kriging as a method for estimating these parameters for unsampled sites. The use of canopy reflectance as a covariate improved prediction of grass and legume percentage of cover in all three sampling schemes studied. The prediction of above-ground biomass was not as consistent given that improvement with cokriging was observed with only one of the sampling schemes because of the low amount of spatial continuity of biomass values. An overall improvement in root mean square error (RMSE) for predicting values for unsampled sites was observed when cokriging was implemented. Use of rapid and indirect methods for quantifying pasture variability could provide useful and convenient information for more accurate characterization of time consuming parameters, such as pasture composition.

Abbreviations: NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index • RMSE, root mean square error

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. S. Flynn, C. T. Dougherty, and O. Wendroth Assessment of Pasture Biomass with the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index from Active Ground-Based Sensors Agron. J., January 11, 2008; 100(1): 114 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]