HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in Crop Science Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, E. A. Articles by Tollenaar, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lee, E. A. Articles by Tollenaar, M. Agricola Articles by Lee, E. A. Articles by Tollenaar, M. Related Collections Crop Physiology & Metabolism Maize Crop Genetics

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Quantitative Genetic Analysis of the Physiological Processes underlying Maize Grain Yield

Dep. of Plant Agriculture, Crop Science Bldg., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1

^* Corresponding author (lizlee{at}uoguelph.ca)

Few studies have examined the inheritance and interrelationships of both grain yield and the underlying physiological processes in maize (Zea mays L.). The objective of this study was to establish genetic relationships between the physiological components of grain yield and to examine the inheritance of grain yield and its component processes (i.e., additive and the nonadditive genetic effects). Twelve F₁ hybrids, obtained by mating three male and four female inbred lines using a North Carolina Design II, were evaluated in trials conducted in Ontario from 2000 to 2002. Dry matter accumulation (DMA) at four stages of development, harvest index, leaf area index (LAI), stay green, and grain yield were measured. Variation among the 12 hybrids was significant for all traits evaluated, and the range in mean grain yield was 28% of the mean. Using the genetic effects partitioned by a Design II analysis, we dissected the physiological mechanisms that influenced favorable or unfavorable contributions to grain yield. Using the highest- and lowest-yielding hybrids in the study (i.e., maximum genetic variation), we attempted to dissect the physiological reasons for the difference in grain yield. This analysis, however, was unsuccessful in dissecting grain yield in terms of physiological mechanisms using a quantitative genetic model. Reasons for this failure may be, in part, (i) the relatively low contribution of statistically significant genetic effects to the differences between the hybrids; and (ii) partitioning of the difference between hybrids in four general combining ability (GCA) estimates and two specific combining ability (SCA) estimates results in small estimates relative to the grand mean.

Abbreviations: DMA, dry matter accumulation • GCA, general combining ability • LAI, leaf area index • SCA, specific combining ability

Related articles in Crop Science:

THIS ISSUE IN CROP SCIENCE

Crop Science 2005 45: xiii. [Full Text]