Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 6 May 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:1120-1131 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heckenberger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Melchinger, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heckenberger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Melchinger, A. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heckenberger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Melchinger, A. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Crop Genetics

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Identification of Essentially Derived Varieties Obtained from Biparental Crosses of Homozygous Lines

I. Simple Sequence Repeat Data from Maize Inbreds

M. Heckenbergera, M. Bohnb and A. E. Melchingera,*

a Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science, and Population Genetics, Univ. of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
b Crop Science Dep., Univ. of Illinois, S-110 Turner Hall, 1102 South Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801

* Corresponding author (melchinger{at}uni-hohenheim.de)

Genetic distances (GDs) based on molecular markers such as simple sequence repeats (SSRs) have been proposed as an appropriate tool to assess the genetic conformity between putative essentially derived varieties (EDVs) and their initial varieties (IVs). However, for maize (Zea mays L.) and other crops, no consensus has been reached regarding GD thresholds for identification of EDVs, mainly because reliable benchmark data are lacking. Our objectives were to (i) determine the variation in the parental contribution (p) to the genome of homozygous progeny lines derived in recycling breeding programs; (ii) investigate the power of SSR-based GD estimates for discriminating between progeny lines derived from F2, BC1, and BC2 populations (BC = backcross); (iii) compare theoretical and simulated results of a companion study to our experimental data; and (iv) draw conclusions with regard to various EDV thresholds suggested hitherto. A total of 220 European and U.S. maize inbred lines comprising 163 triplets were genotyped with 100 uniformly distributed SSRs. A triplet consisted of one F2–, or BC1–derived progeny line and both parental lines. The SSR-based estimates of p varied from 0.25 to 0.74 for F2–derived lines with a mean (0.49) close to the expectation (0.50), and ranged from 0.51 to 0.80 for BC1–derived lines with a mean (0.66) significantly smaller than the expectation (0.75). Relative to the variation in p, the GD between progeny lines and parents was little influenced by the variation in the GD between the parents, particularly for BC1–derived lines. Suggested GD thresholds for EDVs resulted in different Type I ({alpha}) and Type II (ß) errors, depending on the germplasm pool. Considerable overlaps in the GD frequency distributions of F2–, BC1–, and BC2–derived lines indicate that the resolution to discriminate these types of progeny is poor unless a much larger number or a set of extremely polymorphic markers is used.

Abbreviations: AFLP, amplified fragment length polymorphism • ASSINSEL, International Association of Plant Breeders for the Protection of Plant Varieties • BC, backcross • CI, confidence interval • EDV, essentially derived variety • f, coefficient of parentage • GD, genetic distance • IDV, independently derived variety • IV, initial variety • p, variation in the parental contribution • PIC, polymorphic information content • PVP, plant variety protection • SSR, simple sequence repeat • T, potential threshold • UPOV, International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. S. C. Smith, E. Hoeft, G. Cole, H. Lu, E. S. Jones, S. J. Wall, and D. A. Berry
Genetic Diversity among U.S. Sunflower Inbreds and Hybrids: Assessing Probability of Ancestry and Potential for Use in Plant Variety Protection
Crop Sci., June 26, 2009; 49(4): 1295 - 1303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Heckenberger, M. Bohn, D. Klein, and A. E. Melchinger
Identification of Essentially Derived Varieties Obtained from Biparental Crosses of Homozygous Lines: II. Morphological Distances and Heterosis in Comparison with Simple Sequence Repeat and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Data in Maize
Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1132 - 1140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.