HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in Crop Science Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zizumbo-Villarreal, D. Articles by Gepts, P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Zizumbo-Villarreal, D. Articles by Gepts, P. Agricola Articles by Zizumbo-Villarreal, D. Articles by Gepts, P. Related Collections Other Legumes Plant Genetic Resources Crop Genetics

GENOMICS, MOLECULAR GENETICS & BIOTECHNOLOGY

Population Structure and Evolutionary Dynamics of Wild–Weedy–Domesticated Complexes of Common Bean in a Mesoamerican Region

^a Unidad de Recursos Naturales, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, México
^b Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Colima
^c Dep. of Agronomy and Range Science, Univ. of California, Davis, CA

^* Corresponding author (zizumbo{at}cicy.mx)

The diversity, structure, genetic flow, and evolutive relationships within and among three wild–weedy–domesticated complexes and a wild population isolated from crops of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were analyzed under traditional agriculture, within a region of the Mesoamerican center of domestication. Their diversity was compared with the diversity of a local commercial variety and a breeding line. A morphological marker and 37 polymorphic ISSR loci were used. Total genetic diversity within the wild, weedy, and domesticated populations across the complexes was very similar (0.24, 0.22, and 0.26, respectively). Weedy populations within each complex were more closely related to the domesticated than to the wild populations, suggesting they originated from introgression of wild-type alleles into the domesticated populations or predominant gene flow from domesticated to wild populations. The wild population in closest proximity to the crop within its complex was more similar to the domesticated and weedy populations of its complex than to the rest of the wild populations, suggesting displacement of the wild genetic diversity by gene flow from the domesticated population within its complex. The high values of differentiation among wild, weedy, and domesticated populations within each complex suggest high autogamy or genetic drift. However, the values of gene flow among populations within the complexes were close to one, theoretically sufficient to counteract genetic drift and/or autogamy. We therefore assume that human selection is the most important evolutionary mechanism for maintaining the high wild-domesticated differentiation by negative farmer selection of cultivated plants with morphological characters that suggest introgression. Farmers may influence the magnitude and characteristics of gene flow among populations within each complex by the management of the distance between the crops and the wild populations, the diversity within the landraces sown, and the tolerance and harvesting of weedy populations. The high geographic differentiation of the wild populations, together with the local differences in human selection practices and agronomic management, could have generated multiple evolutionary lineages after domestication. Domesticated populations within complexes were between two and four times more diverse than the local commercial variety and four and nine times more diverse than the breeding line. New conservation and breeding strategies are suggested to maintain and use the gene pools from these complexes.

Abbreviations: ISSR, inter simple sequence repeat • QTLs, quantitative trait loci

Related articles in Crop Science:

THIS ISSUE IN CROP SCIENCE

Crop Science 2005 45: xiii. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Barnaud, M. Deu, E. Garine, J. Chantereau, J. Bolteu, E. O. Koida, D. McKey, and H. I. Joly A weed-crop complex in sorghum: The dynamics of genetic diversity in a traditional farming system Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2009; 96(10): 1869 - 1879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Aguilar-Melendez, P. L. Morrell, M. L. Roose, and S.-C. Kim Genetic diversity and structure in semiwild and domesticated chiles (Capsicum annuum; Solanaceae) from Mexico Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2009; 96(6): 1190 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Vargas-Ponce, D. Zizumbo-Villarreal, J. Martinez-Castillo, J. Coello-Coello, and P. Colunga-GarciaMarin Diversity and structure of landraces of Agave grown for spirits under traditional agriculture: A comparison with wild populations of A. angustifolia (Agavaceae) and commercial plantations of A. tequilana Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2009; 96(2): 448 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Martinez-Castillo, D. Zizumbo-Villarreal, P. Gepts, and P. Colunga-GarciaMarin Gene Flow and Genetic Structure in the Wild-Weedy-Domesticated Complex of Phaseolus lunatus L. in its Mesoamerican Center of Domestication and Diversity Crop Sci., January 22, 2007; 47(1): 58 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Zizumbo-Villarreal, M. Ruiz-Rodriguez, H. Harries, and P. Colunga-GarciaMarin Population Genetics, Lethal Yellowing Disease, and Relationships among Mexican and Imported Coconut Ecotypes Crop Sci., November 21, 2006; 46(6): 2509 - 2516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]