Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 6 May 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:1035-1044 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franco, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shands, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Franco, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shands, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Franco, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shands, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biometrics

PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES

A Sampling Strategy for Conserving Genetic Diversity when Forming Core Subsets

Jorge Francoa, José Crossab,*, Suketoshi Tabac and Henry Shandsd

a Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Av. Garzón 780 CP 12900, Montevideo, Uruguay
b Biometrics and Statistics Unit, CIMMYT, Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600, Mexico DF, Mexico
c Maize Genetic Resources Unit, CIMMYT, Mexico
d National Center of Genetic Resources Preservation (NCGRP), USDA, ARS, Fort Collins, CO 80523

* Corresponding author (j.crossa{at}cgiar.org)

When forming core subsets, accessions from a collection are classified into clusters, and then samples are drawn from the clusters with the aim of maintaining the diversity of the collection. In a stratified sampling strategy, the allocation method provides a criterion for determining the number of accessions to be selected from each cluster. This paper proposes an allocation method (D method) and compares it with three other allocation methods (L, LD, and NY methods). In these allocation methods, the number of accessions sampled per cluster is proportional to (i) the mean of the Gower's distance between accessions within the cluster (D method), (ii) the logarithm of the cluster size (L method), (iii) the product of the cluster size times the mean Gower distance (NY method), and (iv) the product of the logarithm of the cluster size times the mean Gower distance (LD method). Five hundred independent stratified random samples with two sampling intensities (10 and 20%) were obtained from four datasets. The allocation methods were compared on the basis of three criteria: diversity of the samples, recovery of the range of variables in the sample, and variances of the samples. Results showed that the D method produced samples (i) with significantly more diversity than the other allocation methods, (ii) that recovered more of the range of the variables, (iii) with higher variances for the continuous variables than the other three methods, and (iv) with variances higher than the variance among accessions of the collection. A sampling intensity of 10% preserves the same or more variability than a sampling intensity of 20%.

Abbreviations: DA, days to anthesis • DS, days to silking • EH, ear height • GM, grain moisture • MLM, Modified Location Model • PH, plant height




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Franco, J. Crossa, M. L. Warburton, and S. Taba
Sampling Strategies for Conserving Maize Diversity When Forming Core Subsets Using Genetic Markers
Crop Sci., February 24, 2006; 46(2): 854 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.