Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 February 2005
Published in Crop Sci 45:645-652 (2005)
© 2005 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tesso, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Tuinstra, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tesso, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Tuinstra, M. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tesso, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Tuinstra, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sorghum
Right arrow Plant Disease
Right arrow Crop Genetics

CROP BREEDING, GENETICS & CYTOLOGY

Analysis of Stalk Rot Resistance and Genetic Diversity among Drought Tolerant Sorghum Genotypes

Tesfaye T. Tessoa, Larry E. Claflinb and Mitchell R. Tuinstraa,*

a Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
b Dep. of Plant Pathology, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506

* Corresponding author (drmitch{at}ksu.edu)

Forty-five drought tolerant sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] genotypes were screened for stalk rot resistance by artificial inoculation with Fusarium proliferatum in field trials near Manhattan, KS, in 2000. Four lines, SC134, SC1154, SC1039, and SC564, were identified with lesions that were smaller than the standard resistant check, SC599. These lines and four other checks were intercrossed in a Design II mating scheme with ‘AWheatland’ and ‘ARedlan’ to produce hybrids for further testing. The inbred parent lines and corresponding hybrids were evaluated for resistance to four major stalk rot pathogens, F. proliferatum, F. thapsinum, F. andiyazi, and Macrophomina phaseolina, using randomized complete block designs in field trials near Manhattan and Hesston, KS, in 2001. Significant differences in lesion length were detected among the inbred parent lines and their corresponding hybrids. Comparisons among entries indicated that crosses of SC701 and SC564 were susceptible and produced very large lesions following inoculation with each of the stalk rot pathogens evaluated in this study. Only small lesions were produced in SC599 and its hybrids following inoculation with either Fusarium species or M. phaseolina. SC134 also exhibited high levels of resistance to Fusarium species and SC35 to M. phaseolina. Comparisons among pathogens showed that inoculations with M. phaseolina produced larger lesions than the Fusarium species in most sorghum genotypes. The most resistant accessions in these studies were all from East Africa; therefore, an analysis of genetic diversity was conducted to evaluate the pattern of genetic relationships among the full set of drought tolerant lines. DNA fingerprinting followed by cluster analyses grouped the entries into five distinct clusters, mainly according to geographical origin. Three of the resistant lines grouped together in a cluster that contained mostly Ethiopian landraces while SC599 grouped in another cluster.

Abbreviations: COI, co-occurrence index • MCA, multiple correspondence analysis • PBS, phosphate buffered saline • PCR, polymerase chain reaction • PDA, potato dextrose agar







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Crop Science Society of America.