Crop Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in Crop Science
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Taba, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Taba, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Taba, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biometrics
Right arrow Plant Genetic Resources
Right arrow Software
Published in Crop Sci. 44:2246-2253 (2004).
© 2004 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES

Statistical Genetics and Simulation Models in Genetic Resource Conservation and Regeneration

Jiankang Wang*, Jose Crossa, Maarten van Ginkel and Suketoshi Taba

International Maize and Wheat Improvement center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, D.F., Mexico

* Corresponding author (jkwang{at}cgiar.org)

A major objective when regenerating germplasm collections is to maintain as many genes (or alleles) as possible. Two stages, sampling and propagating, can be identified in any regeneration cycle. A rare allele can be lost at either stage, when a cross-pollinated population is being regenerated. The objectives of this study were (i) to derive the theoretical probability that one or a few rare alleles will be retained after one regeneration cycle and (ii) to determine, through computer simulation, the average number of alleles lost after a certain number of regeneration cycles. The effects of four mating methods commonly used on cross-pollinated crops (i.e., random pollen pollination, chain cross, paired cross, and self-pollination) were compared. If more than five seeds are harvested from each regenerated plant, the probability that an allele will be lost during Stage 2 can be ignored. However, harvesting and maintaining more seeds than are required for subsequent regeneration cycles will have some negative effects on the retention of genetic diversity. Self-pollination is the best mating strategy for retaining rare alleles only if the germination rate is 100% and all the reserved seeds are regenerated. It can be used for species where inbreeding depression is not serious and the seeds of individual plants from an accession can be stored separately. Paired cross without reciprocal is recommended for regenerating cross-pollinated species, as it results in the same genetic consequence as paired cross with reciprocal or chain cross, but requires only half the number of labor-intensive crosses.

Abbreviations: CIMMYT, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center • GRSimulator, germplasm regeneration simulator


Related articles in Crop Science:

THIS ISSUE IN CROP SCIENCE

Crop Science 2004 44: 1889-1892. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
E. B. Rice, M. E. Smith, S. E. Mitchell, and S. Kresovich
Conservation and Change: A Comparison of In situ and Ex situ Conservation of Jala Maize Germplasm
Crop Sci., January 24, 2006; 46(1): 428 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Crop Science Society of America.